Dmitry Shaytan – Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia

Georgy Laptev – Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2022.73

Full paper

Download file

6th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2022 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana, Slovenia, March 24, 2022, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; ISBN 978-86-80194-57-8, ISSN 2683-4510

ย Abstract:

The research goal is to investigate the specificity of activities of startup entrepreneurial teams that co-develop new product concepts with stakeholders.

We identified a specific pattern of knowledge conversions/transferring through observations of collaborative activities, followed by questionnaires and interviews with members of the entrepreneurial team.

The research pool comprised eleven entrepreneurial teams of 4-6 members each. The predominant objects of conversions and transferring among the entrepreneurial team members and external stakeholders were identified as tacit knowledge types: know-how (what, why), insights, intuition, attitudes, beliefs (as a type of attitudes), and entrepreneurial vision. Types of converยญsions and transferring were the same in all the teams but the application of managerial tools (facilitating means) that allowed transferring/conversions varied. The identified specificity of knowledge processing could be used to optimize those tools/methods by elaborating specific measurable criteria of how efficiently tacit knowledge was transferred and converted.

Keywords:

Entrepreneurial management; New product development; Knowledge transferring; Knowledge conversion

REFERENCES

Agan, Y., Acar, M.F. and Erdogan, E., (2018). โ€œKnowledge management, supplier integration, and new product developmentโ€, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Vol. 16, pp. 105โ€“117.

Akgรผn, A. E., Keskin, H., Ayar, H. and Okunakol, Z., (2017). โ€œKnowledge sharing barriers in software development teams: A multiple case study in Turkeyโ€, Kybernetes, Vol. 46, No.4, pp. 603โ€“620.

Birks, M. and Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: a practical guide. 2nd ed. London: SAGE

Blank, S., (2013). The Four Steps to the Epiphany, K&S Ranch.

Bodas Freitas, I. M. and Fontana, R., (2018). โ€œFormalized problem-solving practices and the effects of collaboration with suppliers on a firmโ€™s product innovation performanceโ€, Journal of Product Inยญnovation Management, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 565-587

Bollinger, A. S. and Smith, R. D., (2001). โ€œManaging organizational knowledge as a strategic assetโ€, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 8โ€“18.

Byrne, R.M.J., (2005). โ€œThe Rational Imagination: How People Create Alternatives to Realityโ€, Camยญbridge, M.A.: MIT Press.

Chun Tie, Y, Birks, M. and Francis, K. (2019). โ€œGrounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchersโ€, SAGE Open Medicine, 7, pp. 1โ€“8.

Constantinescu, M., (2008). โ€œKnowledge Management Through the Lens of Innovation and Labour Productivity in a Knowledge Based Economyโ€, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 65โ€“80.

Cumberland, D. and Githens, R., (2012). โ€œTacit knowledge barriers in franchising: practical solutionsโ€, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 24, No.1, pp. 48-58.

Deck, M. and Strom, M., (2002). โ€œModel of co-development emergesโ€, Research Technology Manageยญment, Vol. 45, pp. 47โ€“53.

Emden, Z., Calantone, R.J. and Droge, C., (2006). โ€œCollaborating for New Product Development: Seยญlecting the Partner with Maximum Potential to Create Valueโ€, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 23, No.4, pp. 330โ€“341.

Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A. and Storbacka, K., (2015). โ€œManaging Coโ€Creation Design: A Strateยญgic Approach to Innovationโ€, British Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 463-483.

Gardner, H., Multiple Intelligences After Twenty Years, Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 21, 2003

Gartner, W.B., Baker T., (2010). A plausible history and exploration of Stevensonโ€™s definition of entreยญpreneurship, Front. Entrep. Res., 30(4), Article 2, http://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol30/ iss4/2

Haldin-Herrgard, T., (2000) โ€œDifficulties in diffusion of tacit knowledge in organizationsโ€, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol.1, No. 4, pp. 357-365.

Hutchinson, V. and Quintas, P., (2008). โ€œDo SMEs do Knowledge Management?: Or Simply Manage what they Know? โ€, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 131-151.

Johnson-Laird, P. N., (2006), โ€œHow We Reasonโ€, Oxford University Press.

Kleber M, Ayala, N.F., Le Dain, M.A., Marcon E. and Frank, A.G., (2019). โ€œKnowledge sharing in colยญlaborative new product development: a study of grey box supplier involvement configurationโ€, Production, Vol. 29, e20180071. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20180070

Koen, P., Bertels, H. and Kleinschmidt, E., (2014). โ€œManaging the Front End of Innovation-Part Iโ€, Reยญsearch-Technology Management, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 34-44.

Laptev, G. and Shaytan, D. (2021). โ€œKnowledge Management in the Early Stage of Collaborative Prodยญuct Design by the Entrepreneurial Teamโ€, in Proceedings of 16th International Forum on Knowlยญedge Asset Dynamics โ€œManaging Knowledge in Uncertain Timesโ€ (IFKAD 2021), Rome, Italy, pp. 1977-1999.

McAdam, R., Mason, B., McCrory, J., (2007). โ€œExploring the dichotomies within the tacit knowledge literature: towards a process of tacit knowing in organizationsโ€, Journal of Knowledge Manageยญment, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 43-59, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710738906

Murray, S. R. and Peyrefitte, J., (2007). โ€œKnowledge Type and Communication Media Choice in the Knowledge Transfer Processโ€, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 111โ€“133.

Musk, E., (2013), โ€œRevolutionizing the Energy Industryโ€, TED talk, URL= <youtu.be/JTZNZOf17N4>, time from 19:40 to 20:20.

Nonaka, I. and Tackeuchi, H., (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies creยญate the dynamics of innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.

Preller, R., Patzelt, H., Breugst, N., (2020). โ€œEntrepreneurial visions in founding teams: Conceptuยญalization, emergence, and effects on opportunity developmentโ€, Journal of Business Venturing (IF12.065), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.11.004

Przepiorka, A., (2012). โ€œThe Relationship Between Attitude Toward Time and the Presence of Meanยญing in Lifeโ€, International Journal of Applied Psychology., 2(3): pp. 22-30, DOI: https://doi. org/10.5923/j.ijap.20120203.02

Riege, A., (2005). โ€œThree-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must considerโ€, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 18-35.

Schwarz, N., (2007). โ€œAttitude construction: evaluation in contextโ€, Social Cognition, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 638-656.

Sinkovics, R. R., Kuivalainen, O. and Roath, A. S., (2018). โ€œValue co-creation in an outsourcing arrangeยญment between manufacturers and third party logistics providers: resource commitment, innovaยญtion and collaborationโ€, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 563-573.

Somech, A., Bogler, R., (1999). โ€˜โ€˜Tacit knowledge in academia: its effects on student learning and achievementโ€™โ€™, Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied, Vol. 133 No. 6, pp. 605-17.

Trevethan, R., (2017). โ€œDeconstructing and Assessing Knowledge and Awareness in Public Health Reยญsearchโ€, Published online 2017 Aug 7, PMCID: PMC5545880, PMID: 28824900, doi: https://doi. org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00194

Vrandea, V., de Jongb, J., Vanhaverbekec, W. and de Rochemontd, M., (2009). โ€œOpen innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives, and management challengesโ€, Technovation, Vol. 29, pp. 423โ€“437.

Wang, S. and Noe, R. A., (2010). โ€œKnowledge sharing: A review and directions for future researchโ€, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 20, pp. 115โ€“131.

YeลŸil, S., Hฤฑrlak, B., (2016). โ€œAn Empirical Investigation into the Influence of Knowledge Sharing Barriers on Knowledge Sharing and Individual Innovation Behaviourโ€, International Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 38-61.

Yin, L., Sun, Q., Tang, D., Xu, Y., Shaoa, L., (2022). โ€œRequirement-driven engineering change manยญagement in product designโ€, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 168, June, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108053

Yin, R. ,K., (1994), Case Study Research. Design and Methods, London, SAGE Publications.

Zammit, J.P., Gao, J.X. and Evans, R., (2016) โ€œDevelopment of a knowledge sharing framework for imยญproving the testing processes in global product developmentโ€, Journal of Product Lifecycle Manยญagement, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-18.

Zorzetti, M., Signoretti, I., Salerno, L., Marczak, S., Bastos, R., (2022). โ€œImproving Agile Software Deยญvelopment using User-Centered Design and Lean Startupโ€, Information and Software Technoloยญgy, Vol. 141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106718

 

 

Share this

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans โ€“ UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

https://www.udekom.org.rs/home

Udekom Balkans is a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of nine years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkan region and worldwide.

EMAN conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.