Mert Topcu – Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics, 07425, Alanya, Antalya, Turkey

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2022.1

Full paper

Download file

6th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2022 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana, Slovenia, March 24, 2022, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; ISBN 978-86-80194-57-8, ISSN 2683-4510

 

Abstract:

Lockdown policies, at the forefront to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus, have led governments to face a trade-off between health and recessionary impacts. To deal with the devastating economic impacts of the pandemic, governments around the world have announced stimulus packยญages. Given the fiscal burden of health-oriented policies, this study investiยญgates the impact of lockdown policies on fiscal policy stimulus packages. Using simple cross-country OLS regression for 162 countries, this study finds that a stricter lockdown policy requires a higher stimulus package. In addiยญtion, threshold regression results indicate that a stringent policy is associatยญed with a higher stimulus package for the countries where income distribuยญtion is relatively unequal and institutional quality is relatively lower.

Keywords:

Lockdown policy; Fiscal stimulus package; COVID-19

REFERENCES

Adedoyin, F. F., Erum, N., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). How does institutional quality moderates the impact of tourism on economic growth? Startling evidence from high earners and tourยญism-dependent economies. Tourism Economics, 1354816621993627.

Arvin, M. B., Pradhan, R. P., & Nair, M. S. (2021). Are there links between institutional quality, government expenditure, tax revenue and economic growth? Evidence from low-income and lower middle-income countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 70, 468-489.

Barbier, E. B. & Burgess, J. C. (2021). Institutional quality, governance and progress towards the SDGs. Sustainability, 13(21), 11798.

Birdsall, N. (2001). Why inequality matters: Some economic issues. Ethics & International Afยญfairs, 15(2), 3-28.

Brodeur, A., Gray, D., Islam, A., & Bhuiyan, S. (2021). A literature review of the economics of COVIDโ€19. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(4), 1007-1044.

Busato, F., Chiarini, B., Cisco, G., Ferrara, M., & Marzano, E. (2021). Lockdown Policies: A Macrodynamic Perspective for COVID-19. EconomiA, 22(3), 198-213.

Clemens, J. & Veuger, S. (2020). Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for state government tax revenues. National Tax Journal, 73(3), 619-644.

Cottarelli, C., Gerson, P., & Senhadji, A. 2014, Post-Crisis Fiscal Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Deng, T., Xu, T., & Lee, Y. J. (2021). Policy Responses to COVID-19 and Stock Market Reacยญtions-An International Evidence. Journal of Economics and Business, 119, 106043.

Elgin, C., Basbug, G., & Yalaman, A. (2020). Economic policy responses to a pandemic: Develยญoping the COVID-19 economic stimulus index. Covid Economics: Vetted and Real Time Papers, 1(3), 40-53.

Faria-e-Castro, M. (2021). Fiscal policy during a pandemic. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 125, 104088.

Inoue, H., Murase, Y., & Todo, Y. (2021). Do economic effects of the anti-COVID-19 lockdowns in different regions interact through supply chains?. Plos one, 16(7), e0255031.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methยญodology and analytical issues. Policy Research Working Paper, No. WPS 5430. World Bank.

Keefer, P., & Knack, S. (2007). Boondoggles, rent-seeking, and political checks and balances: public investment under unaccountable governments. The Review of Economics and Staยญtistics, 89(3), 566-572.

Konig, M., & Winkler, A. (2021). COVID-19: Lockdowns, fatality rates and GDP growth. Inยญtereconomics, 56(1), 32-39.

Samanta, S. K., & Cerf, G. (2009). Income distribution and the effectiveness of fiscal policy: Evidence from some transitional economies. Journal of Economics and Business, 12(1), 14-21.

Scherf, M., Matschke, X., & Rieger, M. O. (2022). Stock market reactions to COVID-19 lockยญdown: A global analysis. Finance Research Letters, 45, 102245.

Solt, F. (2016). The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 97(5), 1267-1281.

The World Bank, World Development Indicators Database (2021).

Thomas H., Noam A., Rafael G., Beatriz K., Anna P., Toby P., Samuel W., Emily C-B., Laura H., Saptarshi M., & Helen T. (2021). โ€œA global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxยญford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).โ€ Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8

Topcu, M., & Gulal, O. S. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on emerging stock markets. Fiยญnance Research Letters, 36, 101691.

Topcu, M., Yagli, I., & Emirmahmutoglu, F. (2021). COVID-19 and stock market volatility: A time-varying perspective. Economics Bulletin, 41(3), 1681-1689.

 

 

Share this

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans โ€“ UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

https://www.udekom.org.rs/home

Udekom Balkans is a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of nine years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkan region and worldwide.

EMAN conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.