Fortune Nwaiwu, Felicita Chromjaková
​Department of Industrial Engineering, Tomas Bata University, Czech Republic
2nd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2018 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 22, 2018, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty –  Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-11-0


Purpose/Motivation: The research assessed the state of supply chain management of companies in the Czech Republic.
Problem: To identify the current state, and to analyse how digitalisation is transforming supply change management in the Czech Republic.
Methods: A quantitative methodological process was adopted to analyse data gathered through an online questionnaire, and simple statistical analysis was used to assess the proposed hypothesis.
Results: The results showed that the current supply chain operations are relatively sophisticated based on current production IT. However, the level of digitalisation is still quite low.
Conclusions: Based on the results and considering the limitations faced when conducting the research, further research effort is recommended to ensure a much deeper level of assessment of the depth of digitalisation within the supply chain industry in the Czech Republic.


Key words

digitalisation, digital transformation, supply chain, digital supply chain, qualitative research


  • Čermák, M., & Svoboda, D. (2017). Digital Czech Republic: How we grow. McKinsey Global Institute.January, 117.
  • Chandra, C., & Kumar, S. (2000). Supply chain management in theory and practice: a passing fad or a fundamental change? Industrial Management & Data Systems100(3), 100–114.
  • Janvier-James, A. M. (2011). A New Introduction to Supply Chains and Supply Chain Management: Definitions and Theories Perspective. International Business Research5(1).
  • Kopp, J., & Basl, J. (2017). Study of the Readiness of Czech Companies to the Industry 4.0. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS INTEGRATION, (3).
  • Lin, B., & Jones, C. (2008). Digital Supply Chain Management and Implementation: A Research Review. Swdsi.Org, (June 2008), 589–592.
  • Lummus, R. R., & Vokurka, R. J. (1991). Defining supply chain management: a historical perspective and practical guidelines. International Journal of Physical Distribution &amp Logistics Management Iss International Journal of Physical Distribution Logistics Management99(1), 11–17.
  • Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management38(3), 192–223.
  • Mentzer, J. T., Keebler, J. S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business22(2), 1–25.
  • Mussomeli, A., Gish, D., & Laaper, S. (2016). The rise of the digital supply network.
  • Pflaum, A., Bodendorf, F., Prockl, G., & Chen, H. (2017). The Digital Supply Chain of the Future: Technologies, Applications and Business Models Minitrack. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2017), 4179–4181.
  • Vrijhoef, R., & Koskela, L. (2000). The four roles of supply chain management in construction. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management6(3–4), 169–178.

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

EMAN conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.