fbpx

NEW TYPES OF WORK AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT

by | Dec 6, 2019 | DOI 2018

Miroslava Knapková
Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Tajovského 10, 975 90  Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
​​​​DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2018.479
​
2nd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2018 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 22, 2018, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty –  Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-11-0

Abstract​

Adult human beings spend more than half of their lives by performing work. Many economists focus on different aspects of the labour market and its conditions and we can find various contributions mostly regarding traditional dependent work performed by employee for employer under the employment contract.
The aim of this article is to provide an overview of new kinds of work that could be performed by individual persons (natural persons) or eventually artificial creature (intelligent non-human creature) and which are developing and spreading because of the technological development. This article is based on the theoretical and empirical economic and legal studies and official legal acts of the member state of European Union (if applicable). According to the available legal definitions, and theoretical and empirical works, I distinguish between the traditional forms of work (categories of work, which are standardly regulated by the labour law or business law in most of the European countries), and new forms of work (they are either not legally regulated or they are partly regulated only in few countries and they exist or may exist in the future because of the technological development). Traditional forms of work are all kinds of paid work, including dependent work (all kinds of employment contracts, such as part-time work, full-time work, working contract for the definite period, working contract for the indefinite period, homework, telework), independent self-employed work, work performed according to the business law contracts (such as contract with a commission agent, mandate contract, managerial contract, contract on the manager director function in the private limited company), and work performed according to the civil law contracts (such as contract of intermediation). Traditional forms of work include also all forms of unpaid work (performed in households by husband and wife, by children, or other household´s members, as well as work performed within the neighbourhood relationships, and volunteer work). Illegal work belongs also to the traditional forms of work. In the current digital economy and society, new forms of work will be increasingly common. Atypical (new) forms of the work are linked with different changes on the labour market. As new forms of work I consider economically dependent self-employment, “crowd work” and “work-on-demand via apps”, which are typical for so-called gig-economy, as well as work performed by artificial creatures. Based on the analysis of more than hundred legal acts from the labour law area of all European Union member states, theoretical and empirical contributions, I tried to sum up legally used definitions and empirical descriptions of unusual (new) types of work. Knowing the changes on the labour market, including an interest of individuals to offer their labour force in new, unusual forms, gives business leaders an overview of new forms of work and provides them a basis for strategic decisions on the company´s employment policy.

Key words

Work, Economically dependent self-employment, Crowd work, Work-on-demand via app, Artificial creature.
​

References

  1. Hunger, J. D., Wheelen, T. L. (2007) Essential of Strategic Management, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, pp. 20-21.
  2. Balkenius, C. (1995) Natural intelligence in artificial creatures. PhD thesis, Lund University Cognitive Studies 37
  3. Boheim, R., Muehlberger, U. (2006) Dependent Forms of Self-employment in the UK: Identifying Workers on the Border between Employment and Self-employment. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1963.
  4. Brooks, R. (1991) Intelligence without representation. In Artificial Intelligence, 1991, vol. 47, iss. 1, pp. 139-159.
  5. Brooks, R. (2002) Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us, Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 2002. 272 pp. ISBN 9780375421938.
  6. Brown, D. (2017) The Gig Economy. Available on SAGE Business Researcher. [retrieved 30-10-2017] https://businessresearcher.sagepub.com/sbr-1863-103233-2807569/20170626/the-gig-economy.
  7. Burda, M., Wyplosz, Ch. (2013) Macroeconomics: A European Text, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 592 p. ISBN 978-0-19-960864-5
  8. Cartwright, S., Holmes, N. (2006) The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism. In Human Resource Management Review, 2006, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 199-208.
  9. De Stefano, V. (2015) The Rise of the ‘Just-in-Time Workforce’: On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the ‘Gig-Economy’. In Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, Forthcoming; Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2682602. [retrieved 30-10-2017] https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602.
  10. Eichhorst, W. et al. (2013) Social protection rights of economically dependent self-employed workers. Study of Policy Department, Economic and Scientific Policy. ISBN 978-92-823-4386-9.
  11. Freeman, R. B. (1977) Job satisfaction as an economic variable. American Economic Review, 1978, v68(2), 135-141.
  12. Frey, C. B., Osborneb, M. A. (2017) The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? In Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, vol. 114, pp. 254-280.
  13. Garcia, C. A., Gonzáles, C. N. (2012) The Regulation of Economically Dependent Self-employed Work in Spain: A Critical Analysis and a Comparison with Italy. In E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, 2012, vol. 1, iss. 1-2, pp. 117-133.
  14. Hook, L. (2015) “Year in a word: Gig economy”, Financial Times, Dec. 29, 2015, [retrieved 30-10-2017] https://tinyurl.com/yaswd5u9.
  15. Morse, N. C., Weiss, R. S. (1955) The Function and Meaning of Work and the Job. In American Sociological Review, 1955, vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 191-198.
  16. Penner, R. G. (1964) Development of the Labor Surplus Economy: Theory and Policy. In Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 1965, 31.2: 283-284.
  17. Rotman, D. (2013) How Technology Is Destroying Jobs. In MIT Technology Review Magazine, 2013. [retrieved 28-10-2017] https://www.shellpoint.info/InquiringMinds/uploads/Archive/uploads/20130802_How_Technology_is_Destroying_Jobs.pdf.
  18. Smola, K. W., Sutton, C. D. (2002) Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. In Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 23, pp. 363-382.
  19. Thompson, P., Smith, C. (2010). Working Life: Renewing Labour Process Analysis. Critical Perspectives on Work and Employment, Palgrave McMillan,2010. ISBN 978-0-230-22223-6.
  20. Wrzesniewski, A. (2003) Finding positive meaning in work. Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline, 2003, pp. 296-308. [retrieved 27-10-2017] https://faculty.som.yale.edu/amywrzesniewski/documents/FindingPositiveMeaninginWork_wrzchapterfromPOS.pdf.
  21. Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J. D., Debebe, G. (2003) Interpersonal Sense making And The Meaning Of Work. In Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 25

​

Knapková_NEW TYPES OF WORK AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT_pp_479-485Download
Share this