Monika Canco – University of Tirana, Faculty of Law, ‚Milto Tutulani‘ St., 1000, Tirana, Albania
Keywords:
Competition law;
Leniency policy;
Private enforcement;
EU law;
Albanian law
Abstract: The scope of this paper encompasses an analysis of the leniency policy introduced by the European Union (EU) public enforcement of competition law and its interaction with private enforcement of competition law, particularly focusing on the approach and challenges of Albania as an EU candidate country.
The purpose of this study is to examine the nature, characteristics, and effectiveness of the EU leniency policy within the context of competition law enforcement. It investigates how the leniency policy affects private enforcement of competition law, particularly in relation to evidence disclosure and joint and several liability. Even though private and public enforcement of competition law are considered to be complementary, the practice has shown that conflicts may arise, especially with the implementation of leniency policy. In addition, this paper aims to examine the Albanian approach to leniency policy and examine possible challenges of the Albanian private enforcement of competition law.
The methodology employed in this study includes a desk review and a comparative study. The desk review methodology encompasses an analytical review of EU standards, treaties, and secondary legislation, Albanian legislation on civil judicial procedure and the public enforcement of competition law. Second, the comparative analysis is conducted to highlight similarities and differences between EU and Albanian competition law concerning leniency policy. In addition, the US example and its substantially different approach towards private enforcement of competition law is examined.
The findings of this paper contribute to an understanding of the complex relationship between the EU public and private enforcement of the EU competition law (especially during leniency proceedings) and its implications for Albanian practice. Lastly, this study’s findings provide new insights into the EU-oriented future of the Albanian competition law, offering suggestions for possible amendments to the actual national competition legislation.

Download full paper

8th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2024 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Rome, Italy, March 21, 2024, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; ISBN 978-86-80194-83-7, ISSN 2683-4510, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2024
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.
REFERENCES
Albania. (1998). The Constitution of the Republic of Albania. Retrieved from: https://qbz.gov.al/preview/635d44bd-96ee-4bc5-8d93-d928cf6f2abd
Albania. (2003). Law On Protection of Competition (9121). Retrieved from: https://wipolex-res.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/al/al067en.pdf
Albanian Competition Authority. (2009). Regulation “On Fines and their Leniency”. Retrieved from: https://caa.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/RRegullore-e-Gjobave.pdf
Albanian Competition Authority. (2016). The Leniency from Fines Program. Retrieved from: https://caa.gov.al/wpcontent/uploads/2023/05/Programi_i_lehtesimit_nga_gjobat.pdf
Albanian Competition Authority. (2019). Guideline “On Damages Caused and Actions Taken when the Provisions of the Law on Protection of Competition are Violated”, Retrieved from: https://caa.gov.al/laws/mbi-demet-qe-shkaktohen-dhe-veprimet-qe-ndermerren-kur-shkelen-dispozitat-e-ligjit-nr-9121-date-28-07-2003-per-mbrojtjen-e-konkurrences-i-ndryshuar/
Albanian Competition Authority. (2023). Annual Report for Year 2023. Retrieved from https://caa.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Raporti-Vjetor-2023.pdf
Aranze, J. (2021). “Mundt touts immunity from damages for leniency applicants”, Global Competition Review, https://globalcompetitionreview.com/article/mundt-touts-immunity-damages-leniency-applicants
Bogdani, M., & Canco, M. (2021). “Private Enforcement of Competition Law- Albanian Challenges in the Reflection of EU Requirements”, SEE Law Journal Special Edition, Issue 1, No. 8, ISSN 2671 – 3128
ECJ. (1973). Case c-127/73 BRT and SABAM, EU:C:1974:25
ECJ. (2001). Case C-453/99, Courage, ECRI – 6314
ECJ. (2006). Joined Cases C-295/04 to C-298/04, Manfredi, (2006), ECLI:EU:C:2006:461
ECJ. (2012). Case C-199/11, Otis (2012), ECLI:EU:C:2012:684
ECJ. (2014). Case C-557/12, Kone (2014), ECLI:EU:C:2014:1317
EU & Albania. (2006). Stabilization and Association Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Albania. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/stabilisation-and-association-agreement-with-albania.html
EU Commission. (2006). Commission Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A52006XC1208%2804%29
EU Commission. (2022). Press Release on Antitrust: The Commission provides guidance on its leniency policy and practice. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_6373
European Parliament and Council. (2014). Directive 2014/104/EU on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa. eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/uri=celex%3A32014L0104
Global Competition Review. (2023). “Albanian Competition Authority”. Retrieved from: https://globalcompetitionreview.com/insight/enforcer-hub/2023/organization-profile/albanian-competition-authority
Hornkohl, L. (2022). “A Solution To Europe’s Leniency Problem: Combining Private Enforcement Leniency Exemptions With Fair Funds”, Kluwer Competition Law Blog, https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2022/02/18/a-solution-to-europes-leniency-problem-combining-private-enforcement-leniency-exemptions-with-fair-funds/
Hüschelrath, K. (2010). “How Are Cartels Detected? The Increasing Use of Proactive Methods to Establish Antitrust Infringements”, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, Vol. 1/6, pp. 522-528, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpq047
OECD. (2023). “The Future of Effective Leniency Programmes: Advancing Detection and Deterrence of Cartels”, OECD Competition Policy Roundtable Background Note, www.oecd.org/daf/competition/the-future-of-effective-leniency-programmes-2023.pdf
Skara, G. (2022). Europeanisation of Private Enforcement of Competition Law-The Case of Albania, Springer, ISBN 978-3-030-97033-8
United Nations. (2015). Voluntary Peer Review of Competition Law and Policy: Albania- Full Report, https://caa.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Peer_review_Albania_UNCTAD.pdf
Venegas, V. (2016). “The Damages Directive and other enforcement measures in EU Competition Law”, Harmonising EU Competition Litigation, the New Directive and Beyond, Hart Publishing, V. 8
Wils, W. (2016). “Private Enforcement of EU Antitrust Law and Its Relationship with Public Enforcement: Past, Present and Future”, Mannheim Centre for Competition and Innovation Law and Economics Conference on Cartel Damages in Europe, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2865728
Ysewyn, J., & Boudet, J. (2018). “Leniency and competition law: An overview of EU and national case law”, e-Competitions Antitrust Case Laws e-Bulletin, Art. N° 105986
Ysewyn, J., & Kahmann, S. (2018). “The Decline and Fall of Leniency Programme in Europe”, Concurrences Competition Law Review, N.1-2018, p 44-59
Ysewyn, J., & van Kruijsdijk, L. (2022). “Leniency and competition law: An overview of EU and national case law”, e-Competitions Leniency, Art. N° 105986
