The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Student Performance: A Comprehensive Review

Lușcan Mihai-Ciprian – Babeș-Bolyai University, FSEGA, Teodor Mihali 58-60, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Abstract: The present research focuses on how students’ performance may be enhanced by artificial intelligence (AI) in a variety of educational set­tings. It examines, via an in-depth examination of a range of available data, how AI technologies and methodologies have been applied to improve aca­demic achievement, student engagement, and learning outcomes. The pa­per discusses the advantages and challenges of integrating AI into teach­ing strategies and provides recommendations for more research and imple­mentation strategies.

8th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2024 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Rome, Italy, March 21, 2024, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; ISBN 978-86-80194-83-7, ISSN 2683-4510, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2024

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission. 

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press.

Baker, R. S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2, 253-272.

Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2012). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press.

Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st-century skills. 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn, 51(2), 47-76.

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). “From Game Design Elements to Game­fulness: Defining ‘Gamification’.” Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 9-15.

Ferguson, R. (2012). “Learning Analytics: Drivers, Developments, and Challenges.” Internation­al Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5-6), 304-317.

Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical para­digm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.

Lane, H. C., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Teaching the tacit knowledge of programming to novices with natural language tutoring. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 313-337.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed. An argu­ment for AI in Education, 18.

Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of mul­timedia learning, 2, 43-71.

Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2021). Technology and education research: Opportunities and challeng­es. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(1), 1-15.

Rekha, K., Gopal, K., Satheeskumar, D., Anand, U. A., Doss, D. S. S., & Elayaperumal, S. (2024, May). Ai-Powered Personalized Learning System Design: Student Engagement and Perfor­mance Tracking System. In 2024 4th International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE) (pp. 1125-1130). IEEE.

Rus, D., Pusnei, I., & Stefanovici, S. (2023). Navigating the Digital Frontier: Teacher Attitudes To­wards AI in Language Education. In International Conference Interdisciplinarity in Engi­neering (pp. 449-458). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Selwyn, N. (2019). “Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education.” Digital Education Review, 35, 20-36.

Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Ed­ucational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123-138.

VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221.