Marko TomljanoviΔ‡ – University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, Ivana FilipoviΔ‡a 4, 5100 Rijeka, Republic of Croatia

Igor CvečiΔ‡ – University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, Ivana FilipoviΔ‡a 4, 5100 Rijeka, Republic of Croatia

Ana Malnar – University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, Ivana FilipoviΔ‡a 4, 5100 Rijeka, Republic of Croatia

Keywords:
CEFTA 2006;
International Trade;
Liberalization;
Competitiveness

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2024.19

Abstract: The research aims to analyse the international trade relations of CEFTA-2006 countries. The research is based on secondary data obtained from the World Bank database and covers the period 2010-2022. The analΒ­ysis includes key indicators of international trade, such as: (1) indicators showing the importance of foreign trade for the national economy; and (2) indicators of international trade that focus on competitiveness and the benΒ­efits of participation in international trade. The research identified a signifΒ­icant import dependence of the assessed group of countries, where the EU was identified also as a major trading partner. The results show that signifiΒ­cant gains have been achieved, although international competitiveness has stagnated, which is particularly evident in the export of high-tech products. As the process of European integration intensifies, the CEFTA-2006 countries need to find more efficient ways to increase competitiveness and invigorate the convergence process, especially through reforms that could boost ecoΒ­nomic progress and further integration.

Download full paper

8th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2024 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Rome, Italy, March 21, 2024, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; ISBN 978-86-80194-83-7, ISSN 2683-4510, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2024

Creative Commons NonΒ Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.Β 

Suggested citation

TomljanoviΔ‡, M., CvečiΔ‡, I., & Malnar, A. (2024). International Trade Relations of the CEFTA 2006 Countries. In C. A. Nastase, A. Monda, & R. Dias (Eds.), International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2024: Vol 8. Conference Proceedings (pp. 19-29). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2024.19

REFERENCES

Andrijanić, I. (2005). Poslovanje u vanjskoj trgovini. Zagreb. Croatia: Mikrorad.

Avelini Holjevac, I., & Vrtoduőić Hrgović, A. M. (2012). Long-term Analysis of Labour Produc­tivity in the Croatian Hotel Industry. Acta Turistica. Vol. 24. No. 1. pp 39-60.

Bilas, V. (2005). Optimal Currency Area Theory: Euro and European Monetary Union. Zagreb. Croatia: Zbornik Ekonomskog fakulteta u Zagrebu. Vol. 3 No. 1. pp. 39-53.

Blatmann, C. (2007). Winners and losers in the commodity lottery: The impact of terms of trade growth and volatility in the Periphery 1870-1939. Journal of Development Economics. Vol. 82. No. 1. pp. 156-179. Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.09.003

CEFTA. (2024). CEFTA Agreement. Retrieved January 15. 2024. from https://cefta.int/about/documents/legal-documents/

Council of the EU. (2022). EU relations with the Republic of Moldova. Retrieved January 15. 2024. from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eastern-partnership/moldova/

Djogo, M., & Staniőić, N. (2016). Is the Global Competitiveness Report the right measure of mac­roeconomic competitiveness. Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics. Journal of Eco­nomics and Business. Vol. 34. No. 1. pp. 91-117. doi: 10.18045/zbefri.2016.1.91

DrastichovΓ‘, M. (2012). The relations of real and nominal convergence in the EU with impacts on the euro area participation. EkonomickΓ‘ revue – Central European Review of Economic IsΒ­sues. Vol. 15. pp. 105-122. Ostrava. Czechia: VΕ B-TU Ostrava. doi: 10.7327/cerei.2012.06.03.

Efremov, K., Velevski, Lj., & Dimitrova, M. (2020). History of CEFTA 2006 – New challengΒ­es and dilemmas. In StaníčkovΓ‘. M.. MeleckΓ½. L.. DoleΕΎelovΓ‘. P. & PowadovΓ‘. T. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual International Conference on European Integration – ICEI Proceedings; pp. 204-213). Skopje: University American College Skopje. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4393665.

European Commission. (2022). Conditions for membership. Retrieved January 15. 2024. from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/enlargement-policy/conditions-membership_en

Grgić, M., & Bilas, V. (2012). Teorija regionalnih ekonomskih integracija. Zagreb. Croatia: Sin­ergija nakladniőtvo. d.o.o.

KandΕΎija, V., & CvečiΔ‡, I. (2008). Makrosustav Europske unije. Rijeka. Croatia: University of RiΒ­jeka. Faculty of Economics and Business.

KandΕΎija, V., & CvečiΔ‡, I. (2010). Ekonomika i politika Europske unije. Rijeka. Croatia: UniversiΒ­ty of Rijeka. Faculty of Economics and Business.

LovrinčeviΔ‡, Ε½., & MikuliΔ‡, D. (2000). Growth. international trade and openness of economy. Ekonomski pregled. Vol. 51. No. (9-10). pp. 1075-1101.

Mathews, A. (2003). Regional Integration and Food security in Developing Countries. Training Materials for Agricultural Planning – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NaΒ­tions (FAO). Rome. Italy. http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/y4793e/y4793e00.html

Stanovnik, P., & KovačiΔ‡, A. (2000). Measuring Competitiveness of National Economies with Emphasis on Slovenia. Working Paper No. 6. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Institute for Economic ReΒ­search. Retrieved March 2, 2024. from http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/00001492/01/Working_paΒ­per-06.pdf

Steunenberg, B., & Dimitrova, A. (2007). Compliance in the EU enlargement process: The limits of conditionality. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Vol. 11, NΒ°5. Retrieved March 2, 2024. from http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2007-005a.html

Ε egota. A., TomljanoviΔ‡. M., & HuΔ‘ek, I. (2017). Contemporary approaches to measuring competΒ­itiveness – the case of EU member states. Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: JourΒ­nal of Economics and Business. Vol. 35. No. 1. pp. 123-150. doi: 10.18045/zbefri.2017.1.123

TFEU. (2012). Article 49. Official Journal of the European Union (C 326/47-390) Retrieved January 15, 2024. from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT&from=EN

TomljanoviΔ‡, M. (2017). Investment in Research and Development – A Factor of Adjustment of the Western Balkan countries to the EU Economy [Doctoral dissertation. University of Rijeka. Faculty of Economics and Business]. Repository of the University of Rijeka. Faculty of EcoΒ­nomics and Business. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:192:186467

VujčiΔ‡, B. (2003). EURO – Europska monetarna unija i Hrvatska. Zagreb. Croatia: Masmedia.

World Bank. (2021a). Exports of goods and services (% of GDP). Retrieved February 1. 2024. from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS

World Bank. (2021b). Imports of goods and services (% of GDP). Retrieved February 1. 2024. from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.IMP.GNFS.ZS

World Bank.(2021c). Imports of goods and services (current US$). Retrieved February 1. 2024. from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.IMP.GNFS.CD

World Bank. (2021d). Exports of goods and services (current US$). Retrieved February 1. 2024. from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.CD

World Bank. (2021e). Trade (% of GDP). Retrieved February 1. 2024. from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS

World Bank. (2021f). Net barter terms of trade index (2000 = 100). Retrieved February 1. 2024. from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TT.PRI.MRCH.XD.WD

World Bank. (2021g). High-technology exports (% of manufactured exports). Retrieved February 1. 2024. from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS

World Bank. (2021h). GDP growth (annual %). Retrieved February 1. 2024. from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZGΒ 

World Bank. (2021i). Employment to population ratio. 15+. total (%) (modeled ILO estimate). ReΒ­trieved February 1. 2024. from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.EMP.TOTL.SP.ZSΒ 

Share this