Nicole Horta – ESCE, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Portugal

Mariana Chambino – ESCE, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Portugal

Rui Dias – ESCE, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Portugal; Center for Studies and Advanced Training in Management and Economics (CEFAGE), University of Évora, Portugal

Keywords:
Clean energy;
2020 and 2022 events;
Co-movements;
Diversification of portfolios

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2023.101

Abstract: The study of the changes between the Energy Fuels Index, S&P Global Clean Energy Index, iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, iShares Global Energy (SWX) ETF, as well as the changes in the prices of crude oil (BRENT), gold (DJ), and natural gas (DG) was deemed extremely relevant given the im­portance and emergence of clean energies in the global landscape, as well as the need to develop more empirical studies, especially confirmative stud­ies on the financial dynamics in these markets. The daily returns under anal­ysis exhibit negative and leptokurtic asymmetry rather than a normal distri­bution. Comparatively, the pre-crisis linkages between the markets for dirty and clean energy are in favor of global portfolio diversification since those low levels of dependence are appropriate to reduce investor exposure to risk. The crude oil market already exhibited a significant effect on the clean ener­gy markets during the Stress subperiod, particularly on the Clean Energy Fuels Index, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, and the iShares Global Clean En­ergy (SWX) ETF. It should be highlighted that the clean energy markets have also increased their impact on the markets for gold and dirty energy (crude oil and natural gas). The findings point to an increase in comovements between the examined indices and the events of 2020 and 2022. These results decrease the possibility that clean energy markets will serve as a portfolio diversifica­tion substitute for the gold and dirty energy markets. For investors and finan­cial analysts who are interested in understanding how the various sectors of the energy market interact, these results may also have consequences. These results can enable a more precise forecast of energy market trends and more informed investment decisions by offering a more detailed knowledge of the link between clean and dirty energy prices.

Download full paper

7th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2023 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana, Slovenia, March 23, 2023, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; ISBN 978-86-80194-69-1, ISSN 2683-4510, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2023

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission. 

Suggested citation
Horta, N., Chambino, M., & Dias, R. (2023). Interconnections between Clean Energy and Traditional Commodities: Analysis of Energy Fuels, S&P Global Clean Energy Index, and Ishares Global Clean Energy ETF Compared to Oil, Gold, and Natural Gas Prices. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2023: Vol 7. Conference Proceedings (pp. 101-116). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2023.101

REFERENCES

Angelini, E., Birindelli, G., Chiappini, H., & Foglia, M. (2022). Clean energy indexes and brown assets: an analysis of tail risk spillovers through the VAR for VaR model. Journal of Sus­tainable Finance and Investment. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2105788 

Basoglu, M. S., Korkmaz, T., & Cevik, E. I. (2014). London metal exchange: Causality relation­ship between the price series of non-ferrous metal contracts. International Journal of Eco­nomics and Financial Issues, 4(4).

Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econo­metrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6

Chen, J., Wang, Y., & Ren, X. (2022). Asymmetric effects of non-ferrous metal price shocks on clean energy stocks: Evidence from a quantile-on-quantile method. Resources Policy, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102796 

Dias, R., Pereira, J. M., & Carvalho, L. C. (2022). Are African Stock Markets Efficient? A Compara­tive Analysis Between Six African Markets, the UK, Japan and the USA in the Period of the Pan­demic. Naše Gospodarstvo/Our Economy, 68(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-2022-0004 

Dias, R., & Santos, H. (2020). the Impact of Covid-19 on Exchange Rate Volatility: an Econo­physics Approach. 6th LIMEN Conference Proceedings (Part of LIMEN Conference Col­lection), 6(July), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.31410/limen.2020.39 

Dias, R., Teixeira, N., Machova, V., Pardal, P., Horak, J., & Vochozka, M. (2020). Random walks and market efficiency tests: Evidence on US, Chinese and European capital mar­kets within the context of the global Covid-19 pandemic. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.24136/OC.2020.024 

Dias, R. T., & Carvalho, L. (2021a). Foreign Exchange Market Shocks in the Context of the Global Pandemic (COVID-19). 359–373. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6643-5.ch020 

Dias, R. T., & Carvalho, L. (2021b). The Relationship Between Gold and Stock Markets During the COVID-19 Pandemic. May, 462–475. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6643-5.ch026 

Dias, R. T., Pardal, P., Teixeira, N., & Horta, N. R. (2022). Tail Risk and Return Predictabil­ity for Europe’s Capital Markets: An Approach in Periods of the 2020 and 2022 Crises. Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development, 281-298. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5666-8.ch015 

Dickey, D., & Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517 

Foglia, M., Angelini, E., & Huynh, T. L. D. (2022). Tail risk connectedness in clean ener­gy and oil financial market. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04745-w 

Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7

Guedes, E. F., Santos, R. P. C., Figueredo, L. H. R., Da Silva, P. A., Dias, R. M. T. S., & Zebende, G. F. (2022). Efficiency and Long-Range Correlation in G-20 Stock Indexes: A Sliding Windows Approach. Fluctuation and Noise Letters. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021947752250033X  

He, Y. X., Jiao, Z., & Yang, J. (2018). Comprehensive evaluation of global clean energy develop­ment index based on the improved entropy method. Ecological Indicators, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.013  

Herranz, E. (2017). Unit root tests. In Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statis­tics. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1396 

Horta, N., Dias, R., Revez, C., & Alexandre, P. (2022). CRYPTOCURRENCIES AND G7 CAPI­TAL MARKETS INTEGRATE IN PERIODS OF EXTREME VOLATILITY ? 10(3), 121–130.

Horta, N., Dias, R., Revez, C., Heliodoro, P., & Alexandre, P. (2022). Spillover and Quantita­tive Link Between Cryptocurrency Shocks and Stock Returns: New Evidence From G7 Countries. Balkans Journal of Emerging Trends in Social Sciences, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31410/balkans.jetss.2022.5.1.1-14   

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7 

Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and se­rial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters, 6(3), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(80)90024-5  

Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & James Chu, C.-S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00098-7  

Liu, N., Liu, C., Da, B., Zhang, T., & Guan, F. (2021). Dependence and risk spillovers between green bonds and clean energy markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123595 

Mighri, Z., Ragoubi, H., Sarwar, S., & Wang, Y. (2022). Quantile Granger causality between US stock market indexes and precious metal prices. Resources Policy, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102595  

Pandey, D. K., Kumar, R., & Kumari, V. (2023). Glasgow climate pact and the global clean energy index constituent stocks. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2022-0815  

Pardal, P., Dias, R., Teixeira, N., & Horta, N. (2022). The Effects of Russia’ s 2022 Invasion of Ukraine on Global Markets : An Analysis of Particular Capital and Foreign Exchange Markets. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5666-8.ch014 

Pardal, P., Dias, R. T., Santos, H., & Vasco, C. (2021). Central European Banking Sector Inte­gration and Shocks During the Global Pandemic (COVID-19). June, 272–288. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6926-9.ch015 

Perron, P., & Phillips, P. C. B. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series Regression. Bi­ometrika, 2(75), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1992.10509923 

Reboredo, J. C., & Ugolini, A. (2018). The impact of energy prices on clean energy stock pric­es. A multivariate quantile dependence approach. Energy Economics, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.10.012  

Shafiullah, M., Chaudhry, S. M., Shahbaz, M., & Reboredo, J. C. (2021). Quantile causality and dependence between crude oil and precious metal prices. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2119 

Tahai, A., Rutledge, R. W., & Karim, K. E. (2004). An examination of financial integration for the group of seven (G7) industrialized countries using an I (2) cointegration model. Ap­plied Financial Economics, 14(5), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960310042000211597 

Teixeira, N., Dias, R., & Pardal, P. (2022). The gold market as a safe haven when stock markets exhibit pronounced levels of risk : evidence during the China crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. April, 27–42.

Teixeira, N., Dias, R. T., Pardal, P., & Horta, N. R. (2022). Financial Integration and Comove­ments Between Capital Markets and Oil Markets: An Approach During the Russian Inva­sion of Ukraine in 2022. Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development, 240-261. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5666-8.ch013 

Tiwari, A. K., Abakah, E. J. A., Yaya, O. O. S., & Appiah, K. O. (2023). Tail risk dependence, co-movement and predictability between green bond and green stocks. Applied Econom­ics, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2085869 

Yahya, M., Ghosh, S., Kanjilal, K., Dutta, A., & Uddin, G. S. (2020). Evaluation of cross-quan­tile dependence and causality between non-ferrous metals and clean energy indexes. En­ergy, 202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117777 

Share this

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

https://www.udekom.org.rs/home

Udekom Balkans is a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of nine years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkan region and worldwide.

EMAN conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.