Svetlana Apenko – Dostoevsky Omsk State University, RF, Omsk, Mira pr-t, 55A, Russia
Yulia Fomina – Dostoevsky Omsk State University, RF, Omsk, Mira pr-t, 55A, Russia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.S.P.2020.75
4th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2020 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Online/Virtual, September 3, 2020, SELECTED PAPERS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; ISBN 978-86-80194-31-8, ISSN 2683-4510
Abstract:
The aim of the paper is to develop and test a new methodology for assessing the level of
maturity of sustainable (green) project management at Russian enterprises, as well as establish the
existing level of maturity and justify ways to improve it. The research was carried out using a methodology
based on the developments of the international association for green project management Global
organization “Green Project Management”. Given methodology is characterized by the addition of the
institutional module of sustainability and indicators of motivational readiness for the implementation of
sustainability. The methodology was tested at 81 enterprises in 12 regions of Russia using the method
of online questioning of experts.
An average level of green project management maturity at enterprises was recorded by means of quantitative
evaluation of the integral indicator and its constituents generalizing indicators according to
four criteria – social, institutional, economic, and environmental. The motives for introducing green
project management are identified.
Keywords:
Sustainability, Project management, Sustainability criteria.
REFERENCES
Hák Tomáš, Moldan Bedřich, & Dahl, A. L. (2007). Sustainability Indicators: a scientific assessment.
Washington, DC: Island Press.
Carboni J., González M., Hodgkinson J. (2013). PRiSM. Project integrating Sustainable Methods.
The GPM® Reference Guide to Sustainability in Project Management. GPM Global. 162 p.
Carboni, J., Duncan W., Gonzalez, M., Milsom P., Young M. (2018). Sustainable Project Management:
The GPM Reference Guide. Novi, MI: GPM Global.
Cohen S., Eimicke W., Miller A. (2015). Sustainability Policy. Hastening the Transition to a
Cleaner Economy. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Brand.
Santos, P. H. D., Neves, S. M., Sant’Anna, D. O., Oliveira, C. H. D., & Carvalho, H. D. (2019).
The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development:
An overview of applications. Journal of cleaner production. 212. 119-138.
Gareis R., Huemann M., & Martinuzzi A. (2014). Project Management and Sustainable Development
Principles. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Gibson, R. B. (2017). Sustainability assessment applications and opportunities. London: Routledge,
Taylor & Francis Group.
Marcon, A., Medeiros, J. F. D., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2017). Innovation and environmentally sustainable
economy: Identifying the best practices developed by multinationals in Brazil.
Journal of Cleaner Production in September, 160. 83-97.
Pislaru, M., Herghiligiu, I. V., & Robu, I.-B. (2019). Corporate sustainable performance assessment
based on fuzzy logic. Journal of cleaner production, 223. 998-1013.
Schröpfer, V. L. M., Tah, J., & Kurul, E. (2017). Mapping the knowledge flow in sustainable
construction project teams using social network analysis. Engineering, Construction and
Architectural Management. 24(2). 229-259.
Silvius, A. G., Kampinga, M., Paniagua, S., & Mooi, H. (2017). Considering sustainability in
project management decision making; An investigation using Q-methodology. International
Journal of Project Management. 35(6). 1133-1150.