Gabrijela Popović
Faculty of Management in Zaječar, Park šuma Kraljevica bb, 19000 Zaječar, Serbia


3rd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2019 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 28, 2019, SELECTED PAPERS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty –  Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-19-6, ISSN 2683-4510


Increasing demand for quality products has an impact on the rising significance of the role of the quality control manager. Recruiting a new quality control manager and his/her selection amongst a greater number of the candidates who have applied is a very complex task. There are a significant number of the criteria that a candidate should meet, which on their part affect the final ranking and selection. It is a very delicate decision because there is a very thin line separating a good choice from a bad one. With the aim of facilitating the process of the selection of a quality control manager, the application of the framework based on the PIPRECIA (PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment) and WS PLP (Weighted Sum method, based on the decision-maker’s Preferred Levels of Performances) methods is proposed in this paper. The applicability of the proposed framework is presented by a numerical example, where three decision-makers evaluate six candidates against the five evaluation criteria.


WS PLP method, PIPRECIA method, quality control manager, selection.


[1] Zolfani, S. H., Rezaeiniya, N., Aghdaie, M. H., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2012) Quality control manager selection based on AHP-COPRAS-G methods: a case in Iran, Economic research – Ekonomska istraživanja, 25(1), pp. 72-86.
[2] Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. L. (1954) An approximate measure of value, Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 2(2), pp. 172-187.
[3] Saaty, T. L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
[4] Hwang, C. L.; Yoon, K. (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making – methods and application, Springer, New York.
[5] Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010) Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA), Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), pp. 243-258.
[6] Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, J., Antucheviciene, A., Zakarevicius, A. (2012) Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment, Elektronika ir elektrotechnika, 122(6), pp. 3-6.
[7] Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015) Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), Informatica, 26(3), pp. 435-451.
[8] Karabašević, D., Stanujkić, D., & Urošević, S. (2015) The MCDM Model for Personnel Selection Based on SWARA and ARAS Methods, Management, 77, pp. 43-53.
[9] Karabašević, D., Stanujkić, D., Urošević, S., & Maksimović, M. (2016) An approach to personnel selection based on Swara and Waspas methods, Bizinfo (Blace) Journal of Economics, Management and Informatics, 7(1), pp. 1-11.
[10] Afshari, R. A., Nikolić, M., & Ćoćkalo, D. (2014) Applications of fuzzy decision making for personnel selection problem: A review, Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness (JEMC), 4(2), 68-77.
[11] Sadatrasool, M., Bozorgi-Amiri, A., & Yousefi-Babadi, A. (2016) Project manager selection based on project manager competency model: PCA–MCDM Approach, Journal of Project Management, 1(1), pp. 7-20.
[12] Dodangeh, J., Sorooshian, S., & Afshari, A. R. (2014) Linguistic extension for group multicriteria project manager selection, Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014.
[13] Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Karabasevic, D., Smarandache, F., & Turskis, Z. (2017) The use of the PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment method for determining the weights of criteria, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 20(4), pp. 116-133.
[14] Stanujkic, D., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015) A modified weighted sum method based on the decision-maker’s preferred levels of performances, Studies in Informatics and Control, 24(4), pp. 461-470.
[15] Shannon C. (1948) A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Bell System Technical Journal, 27, pp. 379–423 and pp. 623–656.
[16] Krylovas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Kosareva, N., & Dadelo, S. (2014) New KEMIRA method for determining criteria priority and weights in solving MCDM problem, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 13(06), pp. 1119-1133.

Share this

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

Udekom Balkans is a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of nine years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkan region and worldwide.

EMAN conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.