Michał Gałkiewicz
Doctoral student at the University of Stettin, School of Business and Economics, ul. Mickiewicza 64, 71- 101 Szczecin, Poland and associated with the University of Applied Sciences Kufstein, Finance, Accounting & Auditing, Andreas Hofer-Str. 7, 6330 Kufstein, Austria through research on the project “Crowdfunding Monitor”.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.S.P.2019.193
3rd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2019 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 28, 2019, SELECTED PAPERS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty – Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-19-6, ISSN 2683-4510
Abstract:
This study provides a first overview of the impact of offering a product besides other characteristics on project overfunding on two large platforms Startnext and Kickstarter based on 4,303 successfully overfunded European projects in the time between 2013 and 2015. In general, the level of overfunding in median equals to 10% on Startnext and 22% on Kickstarter, but varies to a high degree, depending on the industry category, as indicated by the mean of 55% on Startnext and 257% on Kickstarter. Results from regression analysis show that launching a product is significantly increasing the level of overfunding only for some categories of campaigns and in different ways on the two platforms. For Startnext and Kickstarter a comparably strong and medium effect of product offerings on the level of overfunding is only observable for projects from the Technology and Fashion category, respectively. Thus, the comparison reveals important differences which might be potentially interesting for investors, SMEs, founders and their advisors. Future research should focus on larger samples of successful and unsuccessful projects in order to provide more precise results.
Keywords:
Crowd, Overfunding, Product, Startnext, Kickstarter.
REFERENCES
[1] Agrawal, A., C. Catalini, and A. Goldfarb (2015) Crowdfunding: Geography, Social Networks, and the Timing of Investment Decisions, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 24 (2), 253-274.
[2] Gałkiewicz, M. (2018) First Evidence on Differences in Major Characteristics of Successfully Crowdfunded European Projects via Startnext and Kickstarter Platforms, Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference ITEMA 2018 (Graz).
[3] Koch, J. (2016) The Phenomenon of Project Overfunding on Online Crowdfunding Platforms – Analyzing the Drivers od Overfunding, Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS, Istanbul).
[4] Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., and A. Schwienbacher (2014) Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd, Journal of Business Venturing 29 (5), 585-609.
[5] Malave, I. (2012) Why Kickstarter Should More Fully Integrate Social Media, Working Paper.
[6] Mollick, E. (2014) The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study, Journal of Business Venturing 29 (1), 1-16.
[7] Barbi, M., and M. Bigelli (2016) Crowdfunding Practices In and Outside the US, Working Paper.
[8] Gabison, G. (2015) Equity Crowdfunding: All Regulated but Not Equal, De Paul Business and Commercial Law Journal, (13), 359-409.
[9] Frydrych, D., Bock, A. J., and T. Kinder (2014) Exploring Entrepreneurial Legitimacy in Reward-Based Crowdfunding, Venture Capital 16 (3), 247-269.
[10] Koch, J. (2016) The Phenomenon of Project Overfunding on Online Crowdfunding Platforms – Analyzing the Drivers od Overfunding, Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS, Istanbul).
[11] Gerber, E. M., Hui, J. S., and P.-Y. Kuo (2012) Crowdfunding: Why People Are Motivated to Post and Fund Projects on Crowdfunding Platforms, Conference: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Seattle).
[12] Malave, I. (2012) Why Kickstarter Should More Fully Integrate Social Media, Working Paper.
[13] Frydrych, D., Bock, A. J., and T. Kinder (2014) Exploring Entrepreneurial Legitimacy in Reward-Based Crowdfunding, Venture Capital 16 (3), 247-269.
[14] Haas, P., Blohm, I., and J. M. Leimeister (2014) An Empirical Taxonomy of Crowdfunding Intermediaries, Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS, Auckland).
[15] Mollick, E. (2014) The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study, Journal of Business Venturing 29 (1), 1-16.
[16] Kuo, Y.-F., and C.-H. Wu (2014) Understanding the Drivers of Sponsors’ Intentions in Online Crowdfunding, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia (MoMM, Taiwan).
[17] Koch, J. (2016) The Phenomenon of Project Overfunding on Online Crowdfunding Platforms – Analyzing the Drivers od Overfunding, Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS, Istanbul).
