Gabriela Belova – South-West University „Neofit Rilski“, 66 Ivan Michailov St., Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
Gergana Georgieva – South-West University „Neofit Rilski“, 66 Ivan Michailov St., Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
Anna Hristova – South-West University „Neofit Rilski“, 66 Ivan Michailov St., Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2020.193
4th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2020 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Online/Virtual, September 3, 2020, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; ISBN 978-86-80194-30-1, ISSN 2683-4510
Abstract:
Although in the last years the international community has adopted a broad approach, the
definition of foreign investors and foreign investments is still very important for the development of
international investment law. The nationality of the foreign investor, whether a natural person or legal
entity, sometimes is decisive, especially in front of the international jurisdictions. The paper tries to
follow the examples from bilateral investment agreements as well as from multilateral instrument such
as the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Convention. An important
case concerning Bulgaria in past decades is also briefly discussed. The authors pay attention to some
new moments re-developing the area of investment dispute settlement within the context of EU Mixed
Agreements, especially after the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement.
Keywords:
Investment agreements, ICSID Convention, EU mixed agreements
REFERENCES
Ankersmit, L. Achmea: The Beginning of the End for ISDS in and with Europe? https://www.
iisd.org/itn/2018/04/24/achmea-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-isds-in-and-with-europelaurens-
ankersmit/
Broches, A. (1968) Chairman’s Report on the Preliminary Draft of the Convention, 9 July 1964,
doc. Z11, reprinted in ICSID, Documents Concerning the Origin and Formulation of the
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of
Other States, Vol. II.
Case C-284/16 Slovak Republic v Achmea (2018) EU:C:2018:158
Charris Benedetti, J. P. The proposed Investment Court System: does it really solve the problems?
En Revista Derecho del Estado, Universidad Externado de Colombia. nº 42, enero-
abril de 2019, pp. 83-115. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n42.04.
Gaillard, E. (2005) Energy Charter Treaty: International Centre for Settlement Decision, New
York Law Journal, Vol. 233 No. 66.
International Investment Law: Understanding Concepts and Tracking Innovations, (2008)
OECD, ISBN 978-92-64-04202-5.
Marin N. & Paskaleva M. An Analysis of the EU’s investment policy after CETA: Effects on the
Bulgarian economy, EMAN 2020 Conference Paper (in-print)
Mersch, Y., Achtouk-Spivak, L., Affaki, G., Contartese, C. & Vidal Puig, R. The new challenges
raised by investment arbitration for the EU legal order, (2019), ECB Legal Working Paper
Series No 19, ISBN 978-92-899-3867-9, ISSN 1830-2696, doi:10.2866/323286, QB-YH-19-
002-EN-N.
Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24, Decision on
Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005, reprinted in 20 ICSID Rev.-FILJ 262 (2005).
Puccioand, L., Harte, R. (2017) From Arbitration to the Investment Court System. The evolution
of CETA Rules, European Parliamentary Research Service, June 2017 – PE 607.251.
ISBN978-92-846-1171-3 doi:10.2861/856144 QA-01-17-626-EN-N.
Schreuer, C. (2000) ICSID Convention: A Commentary, CUP, Cambridge.
Farhutdinov I.Z. Meždunarodnoe pravo i process, izd. Prospekt, Moskva, 2013.
Tsirina M.A.The Legal Nature of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
(ICSID), Žurnal zarubežnogo zakonodatelʹstva i sravnitelʹnogo pravovedenija № 4, 2017,
pp.106-113.
Julov D.V. Ponjatie i vidy meždunarodno-pravovyh garantij prav inostrannyh investorov, Aktual
ʹnye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2017. № 3 (76) mart, s. 183-192. DOI: 10.17803/1994-
1471.2017.76.3.183-192.