fbpx

Be Free to Communicate on Social Media, but Respect the Values of Education!

by | Aug 31, 2022 | DOI 2022 Proceedings

Alex Sander Pires – Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa (UAL), Center for Research and Development in Legal Sciences Ratio Legis in attention of the research group on Culture of Peace and Democracy, Palácio Dos Condes Do Redondo, R. de Santa Marta 56, 1169-023 Lisbon/Portugal
Carla Dolezel Trindade – Faculty Instituto Rio de Janeiro (FIURJ), Avenida Rio Branco, 277, 4th floor, Rio de Janeiro/Brazil, 20040-904
Simão Aznar Filho – Faculty Instituto Rio de Janeiro (FIURJ), Avenida Rio Branco, 277, 4th floor, Rio de Janeiro/Brazil, 20040-904

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2022.171

Full paper

Download file

6th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2022 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana, Slovenia, March 24, 2022, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; ISBN 978-86-80194-57-8, ISSN 2683-4510

 Abstract:

The technological revolution and the search for the “new post-pandemic normality” require a re-reading of the freedoms of communi­cation (freedom of expression and freedom of information), in order to con­ceive, in the face of the change of the paradigm of digital actors to three el­ements (individual, state and company), a new system that brings togeth­er the public and the particular which can be called collective and private, capable of forming awareness for peace in the face of the guarantee of the right to non-discrimination, centered on the balance between the legal and the civic possible through the binomial instruction-respect, that is, the indi­vidual recognition of respect for human dignity as guided by human rights in the perspective of fundamental freedoms in the posting and sharing of infor­mation on social networks, as oriented by the education values

Keywords:

Freedoms of communication; Culture of peace; Education for democracy

REFERENCES

BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES

Balkin, J. M. (2018). Free Speech is a triangle. Columbia Law Review, 640, 2011-2056.

Delarbre, R. T. (2015). Intolerancia en línea. Entenderla, exhibirla, debartila. Mensajes de odio y discriminación em las redes sociales, 37-50.

Ramírez, M. E. H. (2015). Ciberodio / hate speech online? Mensajes de odio y discriminación em las redes sociales, 51-59.

Ruiz, A. L. S. (2015). Libertad de expresión y redes sociales: espacio para la tolerancia. Mensa­jes de odio y discriminación em las redes sociales, 51-59.

Pires, A. S. X. (2019). Da inversão do paradigma teórico‐prático até a atual concepção da paz como requisito vital para o pleno desfrute dos direitos humanos em igualdade. Galileu – Revista de Direito e Economia, XX (1), 78-98.

Pires, A. S. X. (2018). Fluxos migratórios forçados e cultura de paz: um contributo hipotético baseado na educação como pilar da democracia e na solução alternativa àcrise do estado assistencialista. Galileu – Revista de Direito e Economia, XIX (1), 78-98.

Machado, J. E. M.; Brito, I. A. S. R. (2020). Liberdade de expressão, informações falsas e figu­ras públicas: o perigo de manipulação da esfera de discurso público. Revista Populus – Re­vista Jurídica da Escola Judiciária Eleitoral da Bahia, 8, 207-242.

Case Law References

Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), Case C131/12 – Google Spain SL, Google Inc. vs. Agência Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja González. Available in: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-131/12, last access: 21.02.2022.

European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), Case 77419/16 – Biancardi vs. Itália. Available in: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-213827, last access: 21.02.2022.

Legal References

A/RES/33/73 (UN). Available in: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/ NR0/360/91/IMG/NR036091.pdf?OpenElement, last access: 03.03.2022.

A/RES/39/11 (UN). Available in: https://daccess-ods.un.org/tmp/5050281.28623962.html, last access: 03.03.2022.

A/RES/53/243 (UN). Available in: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/ N99/774/43/PDF/N9977443.pdf?OpenElement, last access: 03.03.2022.

A/RES/55/2 (UN). Available in: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/ N00/559/51/PDF/N0055951.pdf?OpenElement, last access: 03.03.2022.

A/RES/60/1 (UN). Available in: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/ N05/487/60/PDF/N0548760.pdf?OpenElement, last access: 03.03.2022.

A/RES/70/1 (UN). Available in: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migra­tion/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf, last access: 03.03.2022.

A/RES/71/8 (UN). Available in: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/ N16/387/77/PDF/N1638777.pdf?OpenElement, last access: 03.03.2022.

A/RES/71/189 (UN). Available in: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/ N16/454/62/PDF/N1645462.pdf?OpenElement, last access: 03.03.2022.

Constitution of the Portuguese Republic (1976). Available in: https://www.parlamento.pt/Legis­lacao/Paginas/ConstituicaoRepublicaPortuguesa.aspx, last access: 03.02.2022.

Gesetz zur Verbesserung der Rechtsdurchsetzung in sozialen Netzwerken (Netzwerkdurch­setzungsgesetz – NetzDG). Available in: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/netzdg/ BJNR335210017.html, last access: 21.02.2022.

Lei n.º 75/2021, de 18 de novembro, da Assembleia da República Portuguesa. Available in: https://files.dre.pt/1s/2021/11/22400/0000400008.pdf, last access: 21.02.2022.

Lei n.º 27/2021, de 17 de maio, da Assembleia da República Portuguesa . Available in: https:// dre.pt/dre/detalhe/lei/27-2021-163442504, last access: 21.02.2022.

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council, 27 April 2016. Avail­able in: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32016R0679, last access: 21.02.2022

 

Share this