Zvonimir Savić
Financial institutions and economic analyses sector, Croatian Chamber of Economy. Croatia
Ružica Šimić Banović, Ivana Bajakić
Department of Economics, Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Croatia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2019.673

3rd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2019 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 28, 2019, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty –  Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-17-2, ISSN 2683-4510

Abstract:

Corruption presents an extreme case of lacking confidence in society’s official structure. It seems to be rather inevitable issue in transitional countries and appears to be closely related with the existence of relationship-based markets and their (too) slow transformation into impersonal rule-based markets. The evidence shows that corrupt deals impose high transaction costs and that corrupt relations are often embedded in legal relations. No part of the World might be considered fully excluded from corruption phenomenon. Yet, research in Eastern Europe indicates that people feel obliged to reward the help of others, especially when dealing with public sector employees. In addition, ordinary citizens consider petty corruption as a (legitimate) reward for given service and even if they use it often, they do not perceive themselves as bribe-givers or bribe-takers. This paper seeks to disentangle ambiguities, complexities and difficulties in its measurement. Therewith it contributes to the debate on corruption as one of the omnipresent informal practices, fine-tuning of its understanding and possibilities to address it in an efficient way.

Keywords:

Corruption, Eastern Europe, Governance.

REFERENCES

[1] Abed, GT & Davoodi, HR (2000). Corruption, Structural Reforms, and Economic Performance in the Transition Economies. IMF Working Paper, WP/00/132, July 2000. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/30/Corruption-Structural-Reforms- and-Economic-Performance-in-the-Transition-Economies-3697
[2] Adam, C., & Dercon, S. (2009). The political economy of development: an assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), 173-189.
[3] Aligicia, PD. & Tarko, V. (2014). Crony Capitalism, Rent Seeking, Institutions and Ideology. Kyklos. 67:2. 156-176
[4] Ariu, A. & Squicciarini, P. (2013). The Balance of Brains: Corruption and High Skilled Migration. IRES Discussion Paper 2013-10. Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales de l’Universite Catholique de Luovain. https://sites.uclouvain.be/econ/DP/IRES/2013010.pdf
[5] Atoyan, R., Christiansen, L., Dizioli, A., Ebeke, Ch., Ilahi, N., Ilyina, A., Mehrez, G., Qu, H., Raei, F., Rhee, A., Zakharova, D. (2016). Emigration and Its Economic Impact on Eastern Europe. IMF Discussion Note. July 2016. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2016/sdn1607.pdf
[6] Bajakić, I., Šimić Banović, R., Savić, Z. (2019). Competitiveness Today: Is Croatia Addressing Ongoing Global Challenges? in Šimić Banović, R. (Ed.) Sixth Bosnian Herzegovinian, Croatian and Turkish Jurist Days – The Legal Framework for Economic Competitiveness Conference Proceedings. Zagreb: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 153-175
[7] Cooray, A. & Schneider, F. (2016). Does corruption promote emigration? An empirical examination. Journal of Population Economics. 29. 293-310
[8] Culpepper, P. D. (2001). Employers, Public Policy, and the Politics of Decentralized Cooperation in Germany and France. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (pp. 275-306). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[9] Dabrowski, N. (2017). Eastern Europe’s Corruption Renaissance. 18. July 2017 https://intpolicydigest.org/2017/07/18/eastern-europe-s-corruption-renaissance/
[10] Djankov, S., Ghossein, T., Islam, A.M., Saliola, F. (2017). Public procurement regulation and road quality. Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 8234. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/211711509895839032/ Public-procurement-regulation-and-road-quality
[11] Easterly, W. (2001). The Elusive Quest for Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[12] Ensminger, J. (1997). Changing property rights: Reconciling formal and informal rights to land in Africa. In J. N. Drobak & J. V. C. Nye (Eds.). The Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics (pp. 165-96). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
[13] EPRS – European Parliament Research Service (2016). The Cost of Non-Europe in the Area of Organised Crime and Corruption. March 2016 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/579319/EPRS_STU%282016%29579319_EN.pdf
[14] EY (2015). Fraud and corruption — the easy option for growth?; Europe, Middle East, India and Africa Fraud Survey. https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-fraud-andcorruption-
the-easy-option-for-growth-mena/$FILE/ey-fraud-and-corruption-the-easyoption- for-growth.pdf
[15] EY (2016). 14th Global Fraud Survey. Corporate misconduct — individual consequences; Global enforcement focuses the spotlight on executive integrity; https://www.ey.com/gl/en/ services/assurance/fraud-investigation—dispute-services/ey-global-fraud-survey-2016
[16] Fazekas, M., Chvalkovska, J., Skuhrovec, J., Tóth, IJ, King, LP (2013). Are EU funds a corruption risk? The impact of EU funds on grand corruption in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest, Hungary: The Corruption Research Center Budapest Working Paper series: CRCB-WP/2013:03 November 2013. https://www.crcb.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/ Fazekas-et-al_EU-funds-and-grand-corruption-in-CEE_v2_2013.pdf
[17] Glaurdić, J. & Vuković, V. (2017). Granting votes: exposing the political bias of intergovernmental grants using the within-between specification for panel data. Public Choice. 171:1-2. 171: 223
[18] Granovetter, M., & Swedberg, R. (2001). Introduction to the Second Edition. In M. Granovetter & R. Swedberg (Eds.). The Sociology of Economic Life (2nd ed.). (pp.1-28) Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
[19] Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23-48.
[20] Jellema, J., & Roland, G. (2011). Institutional clusters and economic performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 79(1-2), 108-132.
[21] King, L. (2002). Postcommunist Divergence: A Comparative Analysis of the Transition to Capitalism in Poland and Russia. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(3), 3-34.
[22] Kornai, J. (2009). What a Change of System from Socialism to Capitalism Does and Does not Mean?. In S. J. Shapiro, M. Tadajewski & J. S. Clifford (Eds.). Macromarketing: Vol. 1 (pp. 289-304). London: Sage.
[23] Kornai, J. (2010). Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité: Reflections on the Changes following the Collapse of Communism. European Review, 18(3), 379-397.
[24] Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[25] Lemke, C. (2001). Social Citizenship and Institutions Building: EU-Enlargement and the Restructuring of Welfare State in East Central Europe. (Working Paper Series 01.2). Cambridge, MA: Centre for European Studies Program for the Study of Germany and Europe, Harvard University.
[26] Matić, R. (2017). Društvo i korupcija: Politički utjecaj u profesionalnim strukturama javnih institucija kao čimbenik korupcijskog rizika. Društvena istraživanja. 26:2. 187-206
[27] Meydan.tv (2017). The Unbeatable Corruption of Eastern Europe. 4. March 2017 https:// www.meydan.tv/en/site/politics/21505/
[28] Michailova, S. & Worm, V. (2003). Personal Networking in Russia and China: Blat and Guanxi. European Management Journal. 21:4. 509-519
[29] Mungiu-Pippidi, A. & Dadašov, R. (2017). When do anticorruption laws matter? The evidence on public integrity enabling contexts. Crime, Law and Social Change. 68:4. 387– 402.
[30] Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). Corruption: Good governance powers innovation. 15. February 2015 https://www.nature.com/news/corruption-good-governance-powers-innovation-1.16927
[31] North, D. C. (2005): Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
[32] North, D. C. (2008). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York, NY: New York University Press.
[33] OECD (2017). Corruption Prevention in the Education, Extractive and Police Sectors in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. OECD Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia. https://www.oecd.org/corruption/acn/OECD-ACN-Study-Corruption- Prevention-Sector-Level-2017-ENG.pdf
[34] Opper, S. (2008). New Institutional Economics and Its Application on Transition and Developing Economies. In E. Brousseau & J-M. Glachant (Eds.). New Institutional Economics, A Guidebook (pp. 389-406). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[35] Rodrik, D. (2009). One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[36] Roland, G. (2000). Transition and Economics: Politics, Markets, and Firms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[37] Roland, G. (2004). Understanding Institutional Change: Fast-Moving and Slow-Moving Institutions. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), 109-131.
[38] Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Bribes and gifts. In A. Ben-Ner & L. Putterman (Eds.). Economics, Values, and Organization (pp. 296-328). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[39] Schneider, F., Buehn, A. & Montenegro, C. E. (2010). New estimates for the shadow economies all over the world. International Economic Journal. 24(4): 443–461
[40] Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1999). The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[41] Sulik, R. (2017). Manifesto of Slovak Eurorealism: European Union Reform. European Conservatives and Reformists Group. March 2017 https://sulik.sk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/european-union-reform-2017.pdf
[42] Szelenyi, I. & Szelenyi, S. (1995) A Circulation or Reproduction of Elites during the Postcommunist Transformation of Eastern Europe. Theory and Society, Special Issue on Circulation vs. Reproduction of Elites during the Postcommunist Transformation of Eastern Europe. 24(5). 615-638
[43] Šimić Banović, R. (2015). (Former) informal networks as a reflection of informal institutions in East European Transitional Societies: Legacy or opportunism? Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 10(1), 179–205.
[44] Šimić Banović, R. (2019) Uhljeb – a post-socialist homo croaticus: a personification of the economy of favours in Croatia?, Post-Communist Economies, 31:3, 279-300.
[45] The Economist (2011). Corruption in Eastern Europe: From Bolshevism to backhanders. 1 April 2011 https://www.economist.com/node/18560605
[46] The Economist (2016). Procurement spending: Rigging the bids. 19. November 2016 https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21710315-government-contracting-growing-less-competitive- and-often-more-corrupt-rigging-bids
[47] The Economist (2018a). Brazilian ex-president Lula’s corruption verdict does not end his career. https://www.economist.com/news/americas/21735649-it-sure-complicates-forthcoming- presidential-election-brazilian-ex-president-lulas 28. January 2018 (accessed 29. January 2018)
[48] The Economist (2018b). Corruption is still rife around the world. 22. February 2018 https:// www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2018/02/daily-chart-15
[49] Transparency International (2015a). Corruption in five Eastern European Countries Remains Endemic. 2. July 2015. https://www.transparency.org/news/pressrelease/corruption_in_five_eastern_european_countries_remains_endemic
[50] Transparency International (2015b). The State of Corruption: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine https://www.transparency.org/whatwedo/publication/the_state_of_corruption_armenia_azerbaijan_georgia_moldova_and_ukraine
[51] Vehovec, M. (2002). Neslužbeno gospodarstvo i neformalne norme ponašanja: koliko može pomoći etika u poslovnom ponašanju. [Underground Economy and Informal Norms of Conduct: How Much Can Ethics Help in Business Conduct]. Financijska teorija i praksa, 26(1), 229-244.
[52] Williamson, O. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595-613.


Share this

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

https://www.udekom.org.rs/home

Udekom Balkans is a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of nine years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkan region and worldwide.

EMAN conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.