Jelena Z. Golubović
Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova RS, Beograd, Srbija, Stevana Đurđevića Trošarinca, 8/6, 11030 Beograd, Srbija
Vesna M. Milanović
Univerzitet „Union-Nikola Tesla“, Beograd, Poslovni i pravni fakultet, Mladenovac-Beograd, Knez Mihailova 33, 11000 Beograd, Srbija
Andrea D. Bučalina Matić
Megatrend univerzitet, Beograd, Fakultet za poslovne studije, Beograd, Bulevar maršala Tolbuhina 8, 11000 Beograd, Srbija

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2019.559

3rd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2019 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 28, 2019, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty –  Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-17-2, ISSN 2683-4510

Sadržaj:

U radu je prezentovana raznolikost odnosa između komunikacije, grupne kohezije i ishoda tj. zadovoljstva i performansi koji su posmatrani na individualnom i grupnom nivou. Komunikacija je posmatrana kroz informacionu i relacionu dimenziju, komunikaciju licem u lice i elektronsku komunikaciju. Grupna kohezija je posmatrana kroz dimenziju kohezije zadatka grupe i društvenu dimenziju kohezije grupe. Performanse su posmatrane kroz individualne performanse posla, performanse zadatka grupe i kontekstualne performanse. Zadovoljstvo je posmatrano kroz individualno zadovoljstvo poslom i zadovoljstvo zadatkom grupe. Sve navedene varijable imaju osobinu multidimenzionalnosti koja čini da su njihovi međusobni odnosi složeni i još uvek nedovoljno jasni. Zbog toga su i dalje aktuelno područje istraživanja koja imaju multidisciplinarni karakter. Ciljevi ovog rada su: 1) da predstavi grupnu koheziju, komunikaciju, zadovoljstvo i performanse kao multidimenzionalne konstrukte 2) da prezentuje važne nalaze dosadašnjih istraživanja o njihovim međusobnim odnosima i da se na osnovu toga izvedu zaključci o relacijama u kojima se nalaze njihove pojedinačne dimenzije. Shodno navedenom postavljena je struktura rada. Istraživanje relevantne literature je sprovedeno tokom poslednjeg kvartala 2018. godine. Dobijeni rezultati potvrđuju složenost svih varijabli, i raznolikost njihovih međusobnih odnosa koji su redstavljeni kroz tri celine: komunikacija – performanse, komunikacija – grupna kohezija; grupna kohezija – performanse; grupna kohezija – zadovoljstvo – performanse.

Ključne reči:

grupna kohezija, komunikacija, zadovoljstvo, performanse, odnosi, raznolikost.

LITERATURA

[1] Al-Yaaribi, A. and Kavussanu, M. (2017) “Teammate prosocial and antisocial behaviors predict task cohesion and burnout: the mediating role of affect”, Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 39(3)/2017, pp. 199-208, https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2016-0336
[2] Ariely, G. (2014) “Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Conceptual and Methodological Issues”, Political Studies, 62(3)/2014, pp. 573-595, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467- 9248.12068
[3] Evans, C. R. and Dion, K. L. (1991) “Group Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Small Group Research, 22(2)/1991, pp. 175–186, https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496491222002
[4] Mullen, B. and Copper, C. (1994) “The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: Integration“, Psychological Bulletin, 115(2)/1994, pp. 210-227, https://dx.doi. org/10.1037//0033-2909.115.2.210
[5] Pescosolido, A. T. and Saavedra, R. (2012) “Cohesion and Sports Teams A Review”, Small Group Research, 43(6)/2012, pp. 744-758, https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412465020
[6] Salas, E., Grossman, R., Hughes, A. M. and Coultas, C. W. (2015) “Measuring team cohesion: Observations from the science”, Human Factors, 57(3)/2015, pp. 365-374, 10.1177/0018720815578267
[7] Shin, Y. and Song, K. (2011) “Role of face‐to‐face and computer‐mediated communication time in the cohesion and performance of mixed‐mode groups”, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 14(2)/2011, pp. 126-139, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01341.x
[8] Tulin, M., Pollet, T. V. and Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2018). “Perceived group cohesion versus actual social structure: A study using social network analysis of egocentric Facebook networks”, Social Science Research, 74(August)/2018, pp. 161-175, doi: 10.1016/j. ssresearch.2018.04.004
[9] Wise, S. (2014) “Can a team have too much cohesion? The dark side to network density. European Management Journal, 32(5)/2014, pp. 703-711, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. emj.2013.12.005
[10] Banwo, А. О., Du, J. and Onokala, U. (2015) “The Impact of Group Cohesiveness on Organizational Performance: The Nigerian Case”, International Journal of Business and Management, 10(6)/2015, pp. 146-154.
[11] Casey-Campbell, M. and Martens, M. L. (2009) “Sticking it all together: a critical assessment of the group cohesion-performance literature”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(2)/2009, pp. 223–246.
[12] Chang, A. and Bordia, P. (2001) “A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance relationship”, Small Group Research, 32(4)/2001, pp. 379-405.
[13] Hill, S. N., Offermann, L. R. and Thomas, K. (2018) “Mitigating the Detrimental Impact of Maximum Negative Affect on Team Cohesion and Performance Through Face-to-Face Communication”, Group & Organization Management, 44(1)/2018, pp. 211-238, https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118776835
[14] Picazo, C., Gamero, N., Zornoza, A. and Peiró, J. M. (2015) “Testing relations between group cohesion and satisfaction in project teams: A cross-level and cross-lagged approach”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2)/2015, pp. 297-307, 10.1080/1359432X.2014.894979
[15] Robbins, S. and Judge, T. (2013) Organizational Behaviour, 15th ed. Pearson Education, USA.
[16] Wu, X., Wen, B. and Du, M. (2015) “A Multi-Level Research on the Antecedents and Consequences of Group Task Satisfaction, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 5(5)/2015, pp. 264-271, 10.4236/ajibm.2015.55028
[17] Chiocchio, F. and Essiembre, H. (2009) “Cohesion and performance: A meta-analytic review of disparities between project teams, production teams, and service teams”, Small Group Research, 40(4)/2009, pp. 382-420, https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496409335103
[18] McShane, S. and Von Glinow, M. (2003) Organizational Behavior, Emerging Realities for the Workplace Revolution, 7th ed, МcGrow-Hill, USA.
[19] Love, L. R. (2018) “Group cohesion: the effect of diversity”, Global journal of management and marketing, 2(1)/2018, pp. 77-87.
[20] Greer, L. L. (2012) “Group Cohesion Then and Now”, Small Group Research, 43(6)/2012, pp. 655-661, https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496412461532
[21] Lindsjørn, Y., Bergersen, G. R., Dings, T. and Sjøberg, D. I. K. (2018) “ Teamwork Quality and Team Performance: Exploring Differences Between Small and Large Agile Projects”, in: Garbajosa, J., Wang, X. and Aguiar, A. (Eds.), Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 267–274 (19th International Conference XP 2018, Porto, Portugal, May 21–25).
[22] Rosh, L., Offermann, L. R. and Van Diest, R. (2012) “Too close for comfort? Distinguishing between team intimacy and team cohesion”, Human Resource Management Review, 22(2)/2012, pp. 116-127, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.004
[23] Shaw, M. E. (1976) Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, USA.
[24] Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., Paoletti, J., Burke, S. C. and Salas, E. (2018) “Does team communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication and performance, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144 (January)/2018, pp. 145-170, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.08.001
[25] Mason, C. М. and Griffin, М. A. (2005) “Group Task Satisfaction The Group’s Shared Attitude to its Task and Work Environment”, Group & Organization Management, 30(6)/2005, pp. 625-652, https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104269522
[26] Judge, T. А. and Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012) “Job Attitudes“, Annual Review of Psychology, 63/2012, pp. 341–367, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100511
[27] Schermerhorn, J. Jr., Hunt, J. G. and Osborn, R. N. (2010) Organizational Behavior, 11th ed., John Wiley & Sons, USA.


Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia