Osman Sejfijaj, Ermira Shehu
University for Business and Technology, Pristina
Fatmir Memaj
University of Tirana, Tirana – Albania

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2019.193
3rd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2019 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 28, 2019, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty –  Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-17-2, ISSN 2683-4510


This paper investigates the relationships between satisfaction, empowerment, innovation and employee performance. A number of studies prove that employee’s empowerment can be used to enhance and improve the organizational performance of the enterprise by involving employees in development processes, influencing satisfaction and innovation in its overall performance. These empirical studies have analyzed the direct effects of employee empowerment through satisfaction and innovation by supporting the mediating role of employee attitudes and management behaviors. This paper contributes to the literature on employee empowerment by proposing and testing the direct effect of employee empowerment on performance, as well as the effects mediated by job satisfaction and innovation influenced by Kosovo managers in changing dynamic and unsafe conditions. The empirical analysis relies on the data collected through the questionnaire in Kosovo public and private enterprises. The results support the structure of hypotheses presented. Empowering employees has a direct impact on performance through the impact of job satisfaction and innovation.


empowerment, attitudes, involvement, performance, satisfaction.


[1] Ahmed, P.K. and Shepherd C.D. (2010). Innovation management: context, strategies, systems and processes, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow.
[2] Amara, N. and Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: Evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey, Technovation, 25(3), pp.245-259.
[3] Bartel, C. and Garud, R. (2009). The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation, Organization Science, 20(1), pp.107-117.
[4] Bass & Bass (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (4th ed.). New York: Free Press
[5] Boon, O. K., Arumugam, V., Safa, M. S., & Bakar, N. A. (2007). HRM and TQM: association with job involvement. Personnel Review, 36(6), 939 – 962.
[6] Brah, S. A., Tee, S. L., & Rao, B. M. (2002). Relationship between TQM and performance of Singapore companies. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 19(4), 356–379.
[7] Brymer, R. A. (1991). Employee Empowerment. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 58-68.
[8] Calantone, R.J., Cavusgil, S.T. and Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance, Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), pp.515-524.
[9] Caldwell., D.F, O’Reilly, C.A., (1990). Measuring person-job fit with a profile- comparison process; Journal of applied Psychology, Vol.75, pp.648-657.
[10] Cho, H. and Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value, Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), pp.555-570.
[11] Conger, J., & Kanungo, R. (1988). The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482
[12] Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), pp.555-590.
[13] Dow, D., Samson, D., & Ford, S. (1999). Exploding the myth: do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance? Production and operations management, 8(1), 1-27.
[14] Fotopoulos, C., & Psomas, E. (2009). The impact of „soft” and „hard” TQM elements on quality management results. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,
26(2), 150 – 163. Howard, L. W., & Foster, S. T. (1999). The influence of human resource practices on empowerment and employee perceptions of management commitment to quality. Journal of Quality Management, 4(1), 5-22.
[15] Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kılıç, K. and Alpkan, L. (2011)., Effects of innovation types on firm performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), pp.662-676.
[16] Harris, L C. (2001). Market orientation and performance: objective and subjective empirical
evidence from UK companies, Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 17-43.
[17] Herzberg, F. (2009). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
[18] Huiban, J.P. and Bouhsina, Z. (1998). Innovation and the quality of labour factor: An empirical investigation in the French food industry, Small Business Economics, 10(4), pp.389-400.
[19] Johannessen, J.A. (2008). Organisational innovation as part of knowledge management, International Journal of Information Management, 28(5), pp.403-412.
[20] Jung, J. Y., & Hong, S. (2008). Organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), TQM and performance at the maquiladora. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25(8), 793 – 808.
[21] Jung, J. Y., Wang, Y. J., & Wu, S. (2009). Competitive strategy, TQM practice, and continuous improvement of international project management: A contingency study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26(2), 164 – 183.
[22] Kanter, R. M. (1993). Men and women of the corporation (2ed.). New York: Basic Books. Kaynak, H. (2003). The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 405-435.\
[23] Latham, G. P. (2003). Goal setting: A five-step approach to behavior change. Organizational Dynamics, 32(3), 309-318.
[24] Lawler E.E. (1992). The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High Involvement Organization, San Francisco; Jossey Basis.
[25] Lawler, E. E. (1992). Total Quality Management and Employee Involvement: Similarities, Differences and Future Directions. Center for Effective Organization University of Southern California, 16(216).
[26] Murphy, G.B., Trailer, J.W., and Hill, R.C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research, Journal of Business Venturing 36(1), pp.15-23.
[27] Nielsen, Jörn Flohr, and Christian Preuthun Pedersen, 2003. The Consequences and Limits of Empowerment in Financial Services. Scandinavian Journal of Management 19(1): 63-8
[28] Patah, M. O. R. A., Radzi, S. M., Abdullah, R., Adzmy, A., Zain, R. A., & Derani, N. (2009). The Influence of Psychological Empowerment on Overall Job Satisfaction of Front Office Receptionists. International Journal of Business and Management 4(11), 167-167.
[29] Powell, T. C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 15-37.
[30] Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J. and Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs, Journal of Business Venturing, 26, pp.441-457.
[31] Rubera, G. and Kirca, A., (2012)., Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration, Journal of Marketing, 76(3), pp.130-
[32] Samat, N., Ramayah, T., & Saad, N. M. (2006). TQM practices, Service Quality, and Market Orientation: Some empirical Evidence from a Developing Country. Management Research News, 29(11), 713 – 728. Singh, R. K. (2011). Analyzing the interaction of factors for success of total quality management in SMEs. Asian Journal on Quality, 12(1), 6 – 19.
[33] Thomas, K., & Velthouse, B. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681.
[34] Trivellas, P., & Santouridis, I. (2009). TQM and innovation performance in manufacturing SMEs: the mediating effect of job satisfaction. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, December 2009.
[35] Ueno, A. (2010). What are the fundamental features supporting service quality? Journal of Services Marketing, 24(1), 74 – 86.
[36] Ugboro, I. O., & Obeng, K. (2000). Top management leadership, employee empowerment, job satisfaction, and customer satisfaction in TQM organizations: an empirical study. Journal of Quality Management, 5(2), 247-272.
[37] Velnampy. T. (2006). Satisfaction and organizational commitment on the impact of performance, 10th annual international symposium; Growth and challenges for 21st century; p. 338.
[38] Verma, 0.P., (1985) Personality correlates of Job involvement, Perspectives in Psychological researchers, vol 8, No.2, pp. 25 -38.
[39] Vouzas, F., & Psychogios, A. G. (2007). Assessing managers’ awareness of TQM. The TQM Magazine, 19(1), 62 – 75.
[40] Wolff, J.A. and Pett, T.L. (2006). Small-firm performance: modeling the role of product and process improvements, Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), pp.268-284.

Share this

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia


Udekom Balkans is a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of nine years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkan region and worldwide.

EMAN conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.