Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Maja Mihaljević Kosor, Ines Šimleša
Sveučilište u Splitu, Ekonomski Fakultet, Cvite Fiskovića 5, 21000 Split, Republika Hrvatska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2019.165
​​
3rd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2019 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 28, 2019, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty –  Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-17-2, ISSN 2683-4510


Sadržaj:

Glavni cilj ovog rada je istraživanje primjene koncepta efikasnosti u visokom obrazovanju i procjena efikasnosti javnog financiranja obrazovanja u EU-28. Visoko obrazovanje ima značajan utjecaj na razvoj društva i gospodarstva. Više od 19 milijuna studenata u 2016. godini pohađa nastavu na nekoj od visokoškolskih institucija u EU-28 i stoga je iznimno važno proučiti efikasnost tog sustava. U ovom istraživanju primijenjena je metoda omeđivanja podataka – Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). DEA je neparametrijska metoda s linearnim programiranjem koja omogućava korištenje višestrukih inputa i outputa u procjeni efikasnosti. Na taj se način može rangirati zemlje prema ostvarenom koeficijentu efikasnosti visokog obrazovanja. Istraživanje je u ovom radu provedeno na panelu od 28 zemalja Europske Unije koristeći posljednje dostupne podatke za tri inputa (broj studenata, akademsko osoblje i javne izdatke na visoko obrazovanje po studentu) i dva outputa (broj diplomiranih studenata i zapošljivost). Pretpostavka je bila da je model izlazno usmjeren i s varijabilnim prinosima na opseg. Rezultati su pokazali da zemlje Europske Unije ostvaruju visoke koeficijente efikasnosti s 15 zemalja koje su ostvarile najviši koeficijent. Istraživanje je pokazalo i da zemlje koje više izdvajaju za visoko školstvo nemaju nužno viši koeficijent efikasnosti.

Ključne reči:

efikasnost, analiza omeđivanja podataka, visoko obrazovanje, javna potrošnja, EU-28

LITERATURA

[1] Thanassoulis, E., De Witte, K., Johnes, J., Johnes, G., Karagiannis, G. & Portela, S. C. 2016. Application of Data Envelopment Analysis in Education. In: Zhu, J. ed. Data Envelopment Analysis. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. pp. 367 – 438.
[2] Eurostat. Tertiary education statistics. 2018a. [online] raspoloživo na: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Tertiary_education_statistics#Graduates
[3] Farrell, M. 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A), Vol. 120 (3), pp. 253 – 281.
[4] Devine, P., Lee, N., Jones, R. & Tyson, W. 1985. An Introduction to Industrial Economics. London: Unwin Hyman.
[5] Hoxby, C. 1996. Are Efficiency and Equity in School Finance Substitutes or Complements? Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 10 (4), pp. 51 – 72.
[6] Barr, N. 2004. The economics of the welfare state (4th edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[7] Mihaljević Kosor, M. 2013. Efficiency Measurement in Higher Education: Concepts, Methods and Perspective. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences journal, Vol. 106, pp. 1031 – 1038.
[8] Charnes A., Cooper W.W, Rhodes E. (1978): Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, No. 6, str. 429-444
[9] Johnes, J. 2006. Data Envelopment Analysis and its Application to the Measurement of Efficiency in Higher Education. Economics of Education Review, Vol. 25 (3). pp. 273 – 88.
[10] Emrouznejad, A. & Yang, G-l. 2017. A survey and Analysis of the First 40 Years of Scholarly Literature in DEA: 1978 – 2016. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
[11] Abbot, M. & Doucouliagos, C. 2003. The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review, Vol. 22, pp. 89 – 97.
[12] Thanassoulis E., Kortelainen M., Johnes G., Johnes J. (2011.): Costs and efficiency of higher education institutions in England: a DEA analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society (2011) 62, str. 1282–1297
[13] Afonso, A. & Santos M. 2005. Students and Teachers: A DEA Approach to the Relative Efficiency of Portuguese Public Universities. Working Paper No. 07/2005/DE/CISEP. ISEG – UTL Economics.
[14] Katharaki, M. & Katharakis, G. 2010. A comparative assessment of Greek universities’ efficiency using quantitative analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, Vol 49., pp. 115 – 128.
[15] Agasisti, T., 2011. Performances and spending efficiency in higher education: a European comparison through non-parametric approaches. Education Economics, Vol. 19 (2), pp. 199 – 224.
[16] Sopek, P. 2011. Efficiency of public expenditure on education in Croatia. Newsletter. Institute of Public Finance.
[17] Aristovnik, A. & Obadić, A. 2011. The funding and efficiency of higher education in Croatia and Slovenia: a non-parametric comparison. MPRA, Paper No. 31466.


Share this