Aleksandra Cvetković
Faculty of Management Zajecar, Park suma Kraljevica, Zajecar, Serbia
Darko Milošević
Università LUM Jean Monnet, Casamassima (BA), Italy
Miroslava Marić
Faculty of Management Zajecar, Park suma Kraljevica, Zajecar, Serbia

3rd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2019 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 28, 2019, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty –  Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-17-2, ISSN 2683-4510


The purpose of this article is to analyze literature in the organizational behavior field. Powell (1990) contrast three modes of organization and stress the salient features of each – market, hierarchy, and network. The logic of network forms demonstrates how networks differ from other forms, illustrative examples of network arrangements in craft and high-technology industries, in regional economies, and in formerly vertically integrated fields. The aim is to develop a number of empirical arguments about the circumstances that encourage the growth of networks and allow them to proliferate. The paper concludes with conditions that encourage the growth of network forms of organization.


Market, Organization hierarchy, Network, Know-how


[1] Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4,386-405.
[2] Williamson, Oliver E. (1975) “Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications”. New York: Free Press.
[3] Powell, Walter. „Neither market nor hierarchy.” The sociology of organizations: classic, contemporary, and critical readings 315 (2003): 104-117.
[4] Finley, M. (1973). The ancient economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[5] Goldberg, V.P. (1980). Relational exchange: Economics and complex contracts. American Behavioral Scientist, 23(3), 337–352
[6] Arthur, B. (1987). Urban systems and historical path-dependence. To appear in Urban systems and infrastructure, R. Herman and J. Ansubel (Eds.). NAS/NAE, forthcoming.
[7] Sabel, Charles F., et al. (1989) „Regional prosperities compared: Massachusetts and Baden-Württemberg in the 1980s.” Economy and Society 18.4: 374-404.
[8] Dore, R. (1983). Goodwill and the spirit of market capitalism. British Journal of Sociology, 5459-482.
[9] Doz, Y. (1988). Technology partnerships between larger and smaller firms: Some critical issue, International Studies of Management and Organization, 17(4), 31-57.
[10] Borys, B., & Jemison, D.B. (1989). Hybrid organizations as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations. Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 234–249

Share this

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

Udekom Balkans is a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of nine years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkan region and worldwide.

EMAN conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.