Zdeněk Fiala, Olga Sovova
Police Academy of the Czech Republic, Prague
3rd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2019 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 28, 2019, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty – Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-17-2, ISSN 2683-4510
Since the 1970s, especially in the 1990s, an increased interest in management and implementation of its knowledge in the environment of its performance has been seen within progressive public administration reforms. The cause of penetration of managerial approaches to public administration management lies in limited possibilities of public finances, especially taking into account the tasks of the social state, structural economic changes and internationalisation of public affairs. The reform processes are, in particular, aimed at reducing the bureaucratic burden on public administration and the transformation of social politics in line with the economic possibilities of a particular country. Pressure on these processes in public administration is increasing, of course, even with regard to socio-demographic changes resulting in ageing population and an increase in social spending. Within the reform and modernisation processes in public administration, it is therefore primarily important that the authorities of state administration and self-governance are equipped with better tools and get freer power to effectively perform their tasks whilst fully maintaining their responsibilities. The paper focuses at
analysing the concept of good governance, respectively its individual determinants in particular time periods of social and legal development; it is also aimed at bringing to light the ideas of experts who have criticised the concept of the traditional model of public administration and who have emphasised the necessity to introduce management methods into public administration; on this basis it is focused on pointing out the relation of good governance and the modernisation of public administration.
public administration, management, governance, theories, principles.
 Hendrych, D. (2003) Správní věda: Teorie veřejné správy. Praha: ASPI, p. 17.
 Máša, M. (1994) Správní věda: materiál pro distanční stadium. ESF MU. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, p. 7.
 Průcha, P. (2003) Správní právo. 5. amended and modified edition. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, p. 140.
 Simon, H. A. (1959) Administrative Behaviour. Study of Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Free Press.
 Merton, R. K. (1940) Bureaucratic Structure and Personality. Social Forces, year 17, No. 6, pp. 560–568.
 Selznick, P. (1948) Foundations of the Theory of Organization. Administrative Science Review, year 13, No. 1, pp. 25–35.
 Gouldner, A. W. (1955) Metaphysical Pathos and the Theory of Bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, year 49, No. 6, pp. 496–507.
 Hughes, O. E. (2003) Public Management and Administration. Third Edition. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
 Wilson, W. (1987) The Study of Administration. In: Hyde, A. C. and J. M. Shafritz. Classics of Public Administration. Chicago: Dorsey Press, 1987, pp. 10–25.
 Keraudren, P. and H. V. Mierlo. (1997) Theory of public administration reform and practical application. In: Coombes, D. and T. Verheiijen, eds. Public Administration Reform: Comparing East and West Experience. Bratislava: NISPAcee, pp. 29–47.
 Waldo, D. (1948, reprint 2006) The Administrative State. A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. New York: Ronald Press.
 Oakland, J. S. and L. J. Porter (1994). Cases in Total Quality management. London: Butterworth- Heinemann.
 Cheema, S. G. (2000) Good Governance: A Path to Poverty Eradication. Choices: The Human. Development Magazine, year 9, No. 1, pp. 6–7.
 Stoker, G. Public-Private Partnerships and Urban Governance. (1998) In: Pierre, J. eds. Partnership in Urban Governance: European and American Experience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 34–51.
 Atkinson, D. (2002) Local Government, Local Governance and Sustainable Development: getting the Parameters Right. Vol. 4. Cape Town: Humena Sciences Research Council.
 Abrahamsen, R. (2000) Disciplining Democracy: Development Discourse and Good Governance in Africa. New York: Zed Book.
 Massey, A. (2007) Multi-level governance: managing global governance in a differentiated political context. In: Fraser-Moleketi, G., eds. Achievable World: Administration of Global Governance. Prague: Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic, pp. 25–34.
 Smith, B. L. Public Policy and Public Participation: Engaging Citizens and Community in the Development of Public Policy. Public Health Agency of Canada [online]. [quotation 25.2. 2019]. Available in: https://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/canada/regions/atlantic/pdf/pub_policy_ partic_e.pdf; p. 23.
 Ahrens, J. (2001) Governance, Conditionality and Transformation in Post-socialist Countries. In: Hoen, H. W., eds. Good Governance in Central and Eastern Europe: The Puzzle of Capitalism by Design. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 54–90.
 Austin, D. (2001), Good Governance? The Round Table. year 361, No. 1, pp. 497–505.
 Doorbos, M. (2001) Good Governance: The Rise and Decline of a Policy Metaphor. Journal of Development Studies. year 49, No. 37, pp. 93–108.
 Elsenhans, H. (2001) The political Economy of Good Governance. Journal of Developing Societies, year 17, No. 2, pp. 33–35.
 Weiss, T. G. Governance (2000) Good Governance and Global governance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges. Third World Quarterly, year 21, No. 5, pp. 795–820.
 Woods, N. (2000), The Challenge of Good Governance for the IMF and World Bank Themselves. World Development, year 28, No. 5, pp. 823–841.
 Vopálka, V. (2005) Nový správní řád, zákon č. 500/2004 Sb. Praha: ASPI, p. 17.
 Skulová, S. (2009) Principy dobré správy v judikatuře Nejvyššího správního soudu ČR s akcentem na zásadu řádného odůvodnění. In: Košičiarová, S. Eds. Rada Európy a verejná správa: zborník príspevkov z česko-slovenskej vedeckej konferencie konanej 21.–22. apríla 2009 v Trnave (projekt VEGA č. 1/0387/08). Trnava: Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis,
2009, 1 CD, pp. 143–157.