Petya Biolcheva
University of National and World Economy, Bulgaria, 1700, Sofia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2018.838
​​
2nd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2018 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 22, 2018, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty –  Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-11-0


Abstract​

The dynamics of modern society, developed in the context of internationalization and integration of activities and processes of all kinds, identify the need for an adequate  education. Expectations for educational innovation are related to a number of issues. There are many conceptual and practical issues related to effective changes in education, the type of innovation itself, the process of realizing ideas, the necessary set of activities and structures, etc. Now students are looking for interactive learning. They should be placed at the center of the learning process. Transformation in education requires students to participate actively in their own educational process. In this way, they will be able to judge what information they need, when and how to use it.
This paper shows the main directions in which higher education should be developed, and how this can be achieved. Different approaches to innovation education in different universities across countries have been analyzed. This material aims to give an idea to each individual educated how to improve their own development.

Key words

Innovation, Education, University, Students

References

  1. Squire, KD, Jan, M, Matthews, J, Wagler, M, Martin, J, Devane, B and Holden, C (2007), ‘Wherever you go, there you are: the design of local games for learning’, in Sheldon, B and Wiley, D (eds.), ‘The design and use of simulation computer games in education, Sense Publishing, Rotterdam, pp. 265-96
  2. Beyrouti, N.,(2017) Digital Tehnology Management and Educational Innovation: the  Marketability and Employability of the Higher Education Degrees, The Journal of Developing Areas, Vol.51, pp.391-341
  3.   Zambrano, RH 2007, ‘El paradigma de las competenciashacia la educaciónsuperior’, Granada: RevistaFacultad de CienciasEconómicas: Investigación y Reflexión, Vol XV, pp. 145-165.
  4. Joint Quality Initiative (2004). European Higher Education Area. Bologna Process. Available online at: https://archive.ehea.info/folder?year_selected=4&issued_by=349 (Last access date: January 20th, 2015).
  5. Martín, A., Aznar, C., (2017) Meaningful learning in business through serious games, Intangibl-e Capital, IC, 2017 – 13(4): 805-823 – Online ISSN: 1697-9818, https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.936,p.805-824
  6. Ren, X.,(2016) Open and Interactive Publishing as a Catalyst for Educational Innovations, Research Gate, ASCILITE2015, Australia, p.236-244
  7. Quirós, J. L. G., & Gherab, K. (2009). Arguments for an open model of e-science. In B. Cope & A. Phillips (Eds.),The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
  8. Corkern, S., Morhrd, W., Morgan,M., (2017)The Quest for Impact: Increasing the Value and Visibility of Business Schools’ Research, Business Education Innovation Journal, Vol.9, №1, Elm Street Pres, p.43-49
  9. AACSB. (2013). Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation. Tampa, FL, USA: AACSB International

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia