Drago Pupavac
Veleučilište u Rijeci, Vukovarska 58, Rijeka, Hrvatska
Branka Alfreider
Porezna uprava Rijeka, Riva 16, Rijeka, Hrvatska
Stjepan Kolačević
Porezna uprava Rijeka, Riva 16, Rijeka, Hrvatska
​​​​DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2018.509
​​
2nd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2018 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 22, 2018, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty –  Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-11-0


Abstract​

Timski rad jedna je od glavnih značajki suvremenih poslova, a sklonost timskom radu važna sposobnost i vještina u teoriji poduzetničkih dimenzija. U skladu s tim, temeljni cilj ovoga rada jest istražiti sklonost studenata poduzetništva timskom radu, odnosno utvrditi za koje uloge u timskom radu studenti poduzetništva pokazuju visoku sposobnost. Da bi se dokazala ili opovrgnula postavljena hipoteza o visokoj sklonosti studenata poduzetništva timskom radu korištene su brojne znanstvene metode od kojih se izdvajaju metoda anketiranja, metoda deskriptivne statistike i komparativna metoda. Empirijsko istraživanje provedeno je metodom anketiranja (N=98) na Veleučilištu u Rijeci akademske 2017/2018. godine. Anketiranjem su obuhvaćeni studenti stručnog i specijalističkog diplomskog stručnog studija Poduzetništva.
​​​​

Key words

studenti poduzetništva, timski rad, sklonost timskom radu, uloge u timu


References

  • Aritzeta, A., Swailes, S., & Senior, B. (2007). Belbin’s team role model: Development, validity and applications for team building. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 96-118.
  • Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, MA: Addison Wesley.
  • Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. W. (2013). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). Mason, OH: SouthWestern/Cengage Learning.
  • Belbin, M. (1981). Management Teams – Why They Succeed or Fail, Butterworth Heinemann, London.
  • Belbin, M. (2001). Team Roles at Work, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.
  • Drucker, P. (1995). Post kapitalističko društvo, Grmeč-Privredni pregled, Beograd. http//www. azzo.hr (pristup:20.02.2018.)
  • Humphrey, S. E., Manor, M. J., & Morgeson, F. P. (2009). Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: A role composition model of team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 48-61.
  • Katzenbah, R., Smith, K. (1993). The discipline of teams, Harvard Business Review, 71(2).
  • Klein, K. J., Lim, B., Saltz, J. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 952-963.
  • Manning, T, Parker, R., & Pogson, G. (2006). A revised model of team roles and some research findings. Industrial and Commercial Training, 38(6), 287-296.
  • McShane, S., Von Glinow, M.A. (2010). Organizational Behavior, 5th edition, McGraw Hill / Irwin, New York.
  • Postrel, S. (2009). Multitasking teams with variable complementarity: Challenges for capability management. Academy of Management Review, 34(2), 273-296.
  • Pupavac, D. (2017). Organizacijsko ponašanje, Veleučilište u Rijeci, Rijeka.
  • Shani, A. B., Chandler, D., Coget, J. F., Lau, J. B. (2014). Behavior in organizations: An experiential approach (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Zubanov, V. (2012). Uloga menadžment timova u poslovnoj organizaciji, Zadužbina Andrejević, Beograd.

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia